康德“先天的”和“先天知识”的含义

吉首大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 14-20.

康德“先天的”和“先天知识”的含义

（湘潭大学哲学与历史文化学院，湖南湘潭 411105)

出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2012-03-11
作者简介:袁建新（1968-），男，湖南宁乡人，博士，湘潭大学哲学系教授。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目（09BZX040）

On the Meanings of Kant’s Concepts of the A Priori and the A Priori Knowledge

(Xiangtan University；Xiangtan，Hunan 411105,China)

Online:2011-05-15 Published:2012-03-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要：国际学界对康德“先天的”和“先天知识”的标准解释表明，“先天的”不是指人类天赋的知识或固定不变的结构，而是指理性天赋的、永恒不变的原则和规则。这一解释与康德本人的思想基本一致。邓晓芒先生将“先天的”解释为人类先天的固定不变的结构是不对的。因为在康德那里，知识的结构是按照先天原则和规则在时间中构造的结果。

关键词： font-family: 宋体, mso-bidi-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">康德, &ldquo, 先天的&rdquo, 标准解释, 先天原则和规则, 邓晓芒

Abstract: According to the standard interpretation by international scholars,the meaning of a priori does not refer to the innate knowledge or changeless structure,but to the principles and laws of human sense,which are inborn and permanent.This interpretation is in accordance with Kant’s own thoughts.The interpretation that the concept of the a priori is the innate and changeless structure of human beings,put forward by Professor Deng Xiaomang,is incorrect.According to Kant,the structure of knowledge is constructed by a priori principles and laws in the sphere of time.

Key words: font-family: 宋体, mso-bidi-font-family: 宋体, mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt, mso-ansi-language: EN-US, mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN, mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Kant;a priori;the standard interpretation;a priori principles and laws;Deng Xiaomang

袁建新, 田俊. 康德“先天的”和“先天知识”的含义[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2011, 32(3): 14-20.

YUAN Jian-Xin, TIAN Jun. On the Meanings of Kant’s Concepts of the A Priori and the A Priori Knowledge[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, 2011, 32(3): 14-20.

参考文献

[1] 李秋零编译. 康德书信百封[M].上海:上海人民出版社, 2006. 
[2] [德]康德. 纯粹理性批判[M].邓晓芒,译.北京：人民出版社, 2004.
[3] Philip Kitcher. “A priori” [M]. in Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[4] 李秋零编译. 康德著作全集:第2卷：前批判时期著作Ⅱ(1757—1777）[M]. 北京：中国人民大学出版社, 2003.
[5] Sebastian Gardner. Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason[M]. New York：Routledge, 1999. 
[6] Kant. Critique of Pure Reason[M]. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 1998. 
[7] [30]Howard Caygill. A Kant Dictionary[M]. Oxford：Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
[8] 杨祖陶,邓晓芒.康德《纯粹理性批判》指要[M].北京:人民出版社, 2001.
[9] 张世英，等.康德的《纯粹理性批判》[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1987：74.陈嘉明.建构与范导:康德哲学方法论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1992：74.温纯如.认知，逻辑和价值:康德《纯粹理性批判》新探[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2002：74. 李泽厚. 批判哲学的批判——康德述评[M]. 北京:人民出版社, 1979.
[10] 邓晓芒.康德哲学讲演录[M]. 桂林：广西师范大学出版社. 2006.
[11] 《纯粹理性批判》邓译本和蓝译本将德文“Erscheinung”译为“现象”，我们觉得不妥。我们以韦译本和李译本为标准。关于为什么不能将英文“appearance”或德文 “Erscheinung” 译为“现象”，参傅小凡.康德的“appearance”与“phenomenon”的异同辩：兼论“phenomenon”与“象”的哲学意义[J].学术月刊.1997.
[12] [英]I·牛顿.光学[M].周岳明,等,译.北京:科学技术普及出版社,1988. 
[13] L·W·Beck. A reading of the third paragraph in B [M]. in Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven and London：Yale University Press.1978.
[14] Gary Hatfield. Kant on the perception of space (and time) [M]. in Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[15] Lisa Shabel. Kant’s philosophy of mathematics[M]. in Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[16] [德]康德. 纯粹理论批判[M].李秋零,译.北京：中国人民大学出版社, 2004.