Public Behavior Evolution and Resolution Strategy of NIMBY Conflict from the Perspective of Risk Perception—A Case Study of Waste Incineration Project inYuhang,Zhejiang Province

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.04.007

Abstract

Abstract: In recent years,the Chinese public have developed a strong perception of environmental risk brought by harmful NIMBY facilities (waste incineration,chemical plants,etc.),which have caused frequent mass incidents.From the perspective of risk perception,the municipal solid waste incineration project inYuhang,Zhejiang Province has experienced such steps as strong risk perception,firm opposition,declination of risk perception,attempt in understanding,change of attitude,and acceptance.In sequence,the evolution mechanism of public behavior in NIMBY projects follows a logic of physical risk,amplification of the risk perception,generation of the crisis,transformation of the intervention factors,declination of the risk perception,and resolution of the crisis.In order to get rid of the emergency treatment of NIMBY projects,a normal decision-making procedure embedded with public risk perception should be constructed,whose core is the public risk perception,with the close link of risk communication,scientific technical assessment and reasonable interest compensation,the concept of deliberative democracy running through the whole procedure.

Key words: risk perception, NIMBY conflict, behavior evolution, decision-making procedure

SUN Zhuangzhen. Public Behavior Evolution and Resolution Strategy of NIMBY Conflict from the Perspective of Risk Perception—A Case Study of Waste Incineration Project inYuhang,Zhejiang Province[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.04.007.

References

[1] KAHNEMAN D,SLOVIC P,TVERSKY A.Judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1982. [2] FISCHHOFF B，LICHTENSTEIN S，SLOVIC P，et al.Acceptable risk[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1981. [3] 薛可，王丽丽，余明阳.受众对PX项目的风险感知模型建构研究——基于社交媒体使用的视角[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2016（3）：163-168: [4] 侯光辉，王元地.“邻避风险链”：邻避危机演化的一个风险解释框架[J].公共行政评论,2015（1）：4-28；198. [5] 吕书鹏，王琼.地方政府邻避项目决策困境与出路——基于“风险-利益”感知的视角[J].中国行政管理，2017（4）：113-118. [6] 朱正威，王界，吕书鹏．多元主体风险感知与社会冲突差异性研究——基于Z核电项目的实证考察[J].公共管理学报，2016（2）：97-106；157-158. [7] 杨雪锋，何兴斓，徐周芳.环境邻避效应感知风险的建构逻辑与影响因素[J].甘肃行政学院学报，2018（2）：18-25. [8] 邹春霞.“邻避思维”让杭州左右为难[N].北京青年报,2014-05-12. [9] 乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京：译林出版社，2004：88. [10] 王慧敏,江南.杭州解开了“邻避”这个结[N].人民日报,2017-03-24（19）. [11] 陈晨.邻避型群体事件的治理研究——对九峰垃圾焚烧厂事件的追踪分析[D].杭州：浙江工商大学，2017. [12] 刘心.垃圾焚烧厂的杭州难题[J].法人,2014（6）：23. [13] 董碧水,李林,汪泉.“不担心技术做不到就怕监管不到位”[N].中国青年报，2014-05-12（08）. [14] PETERS R G,COVELLO V T,MCCOLLUM D B.The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication:An empirical study [J].Risk Analysis,1997,17（1）:43- 54. [15] HOLTGRAVE D R,WEBER E U,HOLTGRAVE D R,et al.Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks[J].Risk Analysis,1993，13（5）:553-558. [16] 何江波.论工程风险的原因及其规避机制[J].自然辩证法研究，2010（2）：62-67. [17] RABE B.Beyond NIMBY：Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States[M].Washington,D.C.：Brookings.1994. [18] SLOVIC P,FLYNN J H，LAYMAN M.Perceived risk，trust and the politics of nuclear waste[J].Science，1991,254:7-1603. [19] EARLE T C,CVETKOVICH G T.Social trust:toward a cosmopolitan society[M].Westport,CT:Praeger，1995. [20] TVERSKY A,KAHNEMAN D.Judgment Under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases[J].Science，1974,27(9):31-1124 [21] BOSLEY P,BOSLEY K.Public Acceptability of California's Wind Energy Developments:Three Studies[J].Wind Engineering，1988,12(5):311-318. [22] WEALE A.Science advice,democratic responsiveness and public policy[J].Science and Public Policy，2001,28(6)：414. [23] 牛惠之.人类基因数据库的潜在风险议题定性与风险管理模式之研议[C].科技发展与法律规范学术研讨会，2006-12-16. [24] FESSENDEN R，HEATH J S.Providing risk information in communities:factors influencing what is heard and accepted[J].Science Technology Human，1987,12(3-4):94-101. [25] 徐宇宁，刘永德，刘会增，等.重大邻避项目公众沟通要做好“七个转变”[J].中国核工业，2017（1）：32-36. [26] 董幼鸿.“邻避冲突”理论及其对邻避型群体性事件治理的启示[J].上海行政学院学报，2013（2）：21-30. [27] 陈尧.从参与到协商：当代参与型民主理论之前景[J].学术月刊，2006(8):14-21. [28] 谭爽，胡象明.公民性视域下我国邻避冲突的生成机理探析——基于10起典型案例的考察[J].武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2015（2）：36-43. [29] REED M S.Stakeholder participation for environmental management:a literature review[J].Biol.Conserv，2008，141 (10):2417-2431. [30] GARNETT K,COOPER T.Effective dialogue:enhanced public engagement as a legitimising tool for municipal waste management decision-making[J].Waste Manage，2014，34 (12):2709-2726. [31] HARTLEY N,WOOD C.Public participation in environmental impact assessment implementing the Aarhus Convention[J].Environ.Impact Assess.Rev.,2005，25 (4):319-340.