Governance of NIMBY Conflict:Right Dilemma and Transcendence——from the Perspective of Environmental Civic Right

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2016.02.011

Abstract

Abstract:

NIMBY conflict is community members’ practice and environmental movement to strive for rights and benefits concerning their living environment.The ethical dilemma between protecting environmental right and shirking civic responsibility,the difficulty caused by more attention to interest demand rather than environmental protection,and the priority between living environment and social development,constitute the three-dimensional right dilemma in NIMBY conflict,and they also make it possible to govern NIMBY conflict.To avoid NIMBY conflict and get out of right dilemma,transcendence in three directions should be realized,namely,in the balance between environmental protection and civic responsibilities,in the co-construction of interest demand and the concept of environmental protection,and in the co-advancement of social development and living environment.

Key words: NIMBY conflict, environmental civic right, right dilemma, public benefit, cooperative governance

SUN Xuyou. Governance of NIMBY Conflict:Right Dilemma and Transcendence——from the Perspective of Environmental Civic Right[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2016.02.011.

References

[1] 赵小燕.邻避冲突参与动机及其治理——基于三种人性假设的视角[J].武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2014（2）.
[2] 张乐，童星.价值、理性与权力：“邻避式抗争”的实践逻辑——基于一个核电站备选厂址的案例分析[J].上海行政学院学报，2014（1）.
[3] 黄岩，文锦.邻避设施与邻避运动[J].城市问题，2010（12）.
[4] 徐祖迎，朱玉芹.邻避冲突治理的困境、成因及破解思路[J].理论探索，2013（6）.
[5] 孟薇，孔繁斌.邻避冲突的成因分析及其治理工具选择——基于政策利益结构分布的视角[J].江苏行政学院学报，2014（2）.
[6] 何艳玲.中国式邻避冲突：基于事件的分析[J].开放时代，2009（12）.
[7] 侯光辉，王元地.邻避危机为何愈演愈烈——一个整合性归因模型[J].公共管理学报，2014（3）.
[8] 王彩波，张磊.试析邻避冲突对政府的挑战——以环境正义为视角的分析[J].社会科学战线，2012（8）.
[9] 李修祺.为权利而斗争：环境群体性事件的多视角解读[J].江西社会科学，2013（11）.
[10] M Elliot Vittes，Philip H，Pollock ó，Stuart A Lilie.Factors Contributing to NIMBY Attitudes[ J].Waste Management，1993(13).
[11] See Pete Nyers.Introduction:Why Citizenship Studies[J].Citizenship Studies，2007（1）.
[12] 翁久惠.嫌恶性设施对生活环境质量影响之研究——以台北市内湖、木栅、士林三个垃圾焚化厂为例[D].台北：国立政治大学，1993.
[13] Peter M.Sandman.Getting t Maybe:Some Communicationg aspects of Siting Hazardous Waset Facilities[J].Seton Hall Legislative Journal，1986（2）.
[14] MacIntyre，A.After Virtue:A Study in Moral Theory[M].Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press，1981.
[15] 李永展.邻避症候群之解析[J].都市计划书，1997(1).
[16] Mazmanian D，Morell D.The NIMBY syndrom e：Facil ity s it ingand the failure of emocratic discou rse[M]//In NVig，M K raft.Environmental policy in the 1990 s：Towards a new agenda.CQPress，1990.
[17] Bruno S.Frey，Felix Oberhoizer-Gee，and Reiner Eichenberger.The Older Lady Visits Your Bankyard：A Tale of Morals＆Merkets[J].Journal of Political Economy，1996(2).
[18] 段文灵.论合理功利意识性爱的奉献精神——新世纪革命军人奉献观探究[J].伦理学研究，2006（2）.
[19] 安德鲁.多布森.传统公民权的“生态挑战”——从政治生态学看公民权理论[J].郭晨星，译.文史哲，2007(1).
[20] 迪安.克定生.态公民权[M]//恩靳·伊辛，布雷恩·特纳.公民权研究手册.王小章，译.杭州：浙江人民出版社，2007.
[21] U K John Barry.Resistance is fertile:from environmental to sustainability Citizenship[J].Journal of Literature History & Philosophy，2007（1）.
[22] 刘超，杨娇.协商民主视角下的邻避冲突治理[J].吉首大学学报（社会科学版），2015（3）.