Governance Practice and Framework Construction of NIMBY Conflict from the Perspective of Functionalism:Based on Typical Cases

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.04.006

Abstract

Abstract: A correct understanding and scientific management of NIMBY conflicts is of great significance to promote the modernization of the governance system and governance capacity and prevent major risks.Based on the perspective of "functional theory",it is not difficult to find that there are negative functions caused by improper strategies such as negligent governance and extensive governance of NIMBY conflict in our country.At the same time,the positive functions,inspired bythe long-term and diversified governance,etc.,are also presented.In view of this,we should further reflect on and optimize the governance concepts and specific measures at various stages of NIMBY conflict,such as the incubation period,outbreak period,extension period and recovery period,so as to rid the negative functions and stimulate the positive functions,turning "governance difficulties" into "governance inflection points" and reversing "threats" to "opportunities".

Key words: functional theory, NIMBY conflict, life cycle of crisis, governance framework

TAN Shuang. Governance Practice and Framework Construction of NIMBY Conflict from the Perspective of Functionalism:Based on Typical Cases[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.04.006.

References

[1] 谭爽,胡象明.中国大型工程社会稳定风险治理悖论及其生成机理——基于对B市A垃圾焚烧厂反建事件的扎根分析[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2015(6):60-67. [2] 侯光辉,王元地.“邻避风险链”:邻避危机演化的一个风险解释框架[J].公共行政评论,2015(1):4-28;198 [3] 陶鹏,童星.邻避型群体性事件及其治理[J].南京社会科学,2010(8):63-68. [4] 谭爽.浅析邻避型群体事件的生成及规避[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2014(2):78-84. [5] 赵小燕.邻避冲突参与动机及其治理:基于三种人性假设的视角[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014(2):36-41. [6] 王刚,毕欢欢.“政治机会结构”视域下环境邻避运动的发生逻辑及其治理——基于双案例的对比分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2017(2):97-106. [7] 王冰,韩金成.公共价值视阈下的中国邻避问题研究——一个整合性理论框架[J].中国行政管理,2017(12):76-80. [8] 乔艳洁,曹婷,唐华.从公共政策角度探析邻避效应[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报(社会科学版),2007(1):93-94；97. [9] 何羿，赵智杰.环境影响评价在规避邻避效应中的作用与问题[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2013(6):1056-1064. [10] 何艳玲.“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J].开放时代,2009(12):102-114. [11] 崔晶.从“后院”抗争到公众参与——对城市化进程中邻避抗争研究的反思[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015(5):28-35. [12] STEINHARDT H C,WU F.In the Name of the Public:Environmental Protest and the Changing Landscape of Popular Contention in China[J].China Journal,2016(75):61-79 [13] GIBBS L M.25 years of an inspirational journey：From Love Canal to the nation.Pioneer Conference Plenary Presentation （Marin Center，’San‘ Rafael，CA，20 October 2006. [14] SMITH M J.Ecologism：Towards Ecological Citizenship[M].Buckingham：Open University Press，1998. [15] 龚志文.运动式政策参与:公民与政府的理性互动——基于广州番禺反焚运动的分析[J].吉首大学学报（社会科学版），2015(1):50-59. [16] 张明军.社会冲突:破坏抑或建构——基于典型样本的现实解读[J].行政论坛,2015(1):1-6. [17] JOHNSON T.Environmentalism and NIMBYism in China:promoting a rules-based approach to public participation[J].Environmental Politics,2010,19(3):430-448. [18] 谭爽,胡象明.邻避运动与环境公民的培育——基于A垃圾焚烧厂反建事件的个案研究[J].中国地质大学学报（社会科学版）,2016(5):52-63. [19] 黄瑞祺.社会理论与社会世界[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2005:38-39. [20] 罗伯特·金·默顿.论理论社会学[M].何凡兴，李卫红，王丽娟，译.北京：华夏出版社，1990. [21] 尹瑛.冲突性环境议题中民意表达的困境与策略——对“北京六里屯垃圾焚烧厂”事件的个案分析[J].新闻与传播评论,2009(1):76. [22] 谭爽.从“环境抗争”到“环境治理”:转型路径与经验启示——对典型个案的扎根研究[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2017(5):504-511. [23] 任丙强.邻避冲突作为公众议程:一个描述性框架[J].地方治理研究,2017(4):76. [24] 黄振威.邻避项目决策是如何做出来的?——基于领导干部调查问卷的分析[J].探索,2018(1):74-81. [25] 乌尔里希·贝克.世界风险社会[M].吴英姿,孙淑敏,译.南京：南京大学出版社，2004:120. [26] FARAZMAND A.Learning From the Katrina Crisis:A Global and International Perspective with Implications for Future Crisis Management[J].Public Administration Review,2007,67(1):149-159.