The Generation and Solution of NIMBY Conflicts from the Perspective of Environmental Justice

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.02.008

Abstract

Abstract: As a kind of social event of environment,NIMBY is directly related to environment rights and interests.Only from the perspective of environmental justice can we get a deep understanding of the causes of NIMBY conflicts,and only when the environmental rights and interests of residents are treated fairly can the scientific management of NIMBY conflicts be realized.The unclear definition of civil environmental rights,the unbalanced distribution of environmental interests and the use of environmental elements are all likely to lead to the occurrence of NIMBY conflicts.In order to prevent the occurrence of NIMBY conflicts,the principle of environmental justice must be applied to the governance.First of all,through a clear realization of civil environmental rights,environmental recognition justice can be achieved and the environment can be used according to law.Secondly,the environmental distributive justice can be realized through the balanced distribution of environmental benefits,and the negative externalities of NIMBY facilities can be eliminated.Finally,through scientific decision-making model,environmental procedural justice can be approached and the occurrence of disputes of environmental rights and interests can be reduced.

Key words: NIMBY conflict, environmental justice, civil environmental right, distributive justice, procedural justice

LIU Hailong. The Generation and Solution of NIMBY Conflicts from the Perspective of Environmental Justice[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.02.008.

References

[1] Morell D.Siting and Politics of Equity[J].Hazardous Waste,1984(1). [2] 陶鹏,童星.邻避型群体性事件及其治理[J].南京社会科学，2010（8）. [3] 李小敏，胡象明.邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J].中国行政管理，2015（3）. [4] 管在高.邻避型群体性事件产生的原因及预防对策[J].管理学刊,2010(6). [5] Matheny A R.Williams B A.Knowledge vs.NIMBY:Assessing Florida's Strategy for Siting Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities [J].Policy Studies Journal,1985(1). [6] Bachrach K M,Zautra A J.Coping with a Community Stressor:The Threat of a Hazardous Waste Facility[J].Journal of Health and Social Behavior,1985(2). [7] 周亚越，俞海山.邻避冲突、外部性及其政府治理的经济手段研究[J].浙江社会科学2015(2). [8] 孟薇，孔繁斌.邻避冲突的成因分析及其治理工具选择——基于政策利益结构分布的视角[J].江苏行政学院学报，2014（2）. [9] 张乐，童星.“邻避”冲突管理中的决策困境及其解决思路[J].中国行政管理，2014（4）. [10] 刘超.城市邻避冲突的协商治理——基于湖南湘潭九华垃圾焚烧厂事件的实证研究[J].吉首大学学报（社会科学版），2016（5）. [11] Mitchell R,Carson R.Property Rights,Protest,and the Siting of Hazardous Waste Facilities[J].The American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings,1986(2). [12] Broadbent J.Environmental Politics in Japan:Networks of Power and Pretest[M].Cambridge University Press,1998. [13] Bacot H,Bowen T,Fitzgerald M.R.Managing The Solid Waste Crisis[J].Policy Studies Journal,1994(2). [14] Leroy D H,Nadler T S.Negotiate Way Out of Siting Dilemmas[J].Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy,1993(1). [15] Rabe B G.Beyond NIMBY：Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States[M].Washington D C:Brookings Institution Press，1994. [16] 吕忠梅.再论公民环境权[J].法学研究，2000（6）. [17] 郁乐.环境正义的分配、矫正与承认及其内在逻辑[J].吉首大学学报（社会科学版），2017（2）.