“恐同症”的根源——基于宗教、现代性和文化的阐释

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2013.01.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：西方社会的宗教是产生恐同症的重要原因，然而在宗教话语和道德实践中同性恋行为与非生殖的异性恋行为共同遭受惩戒。促成同性恋身份的现代性条件本身孕育着恐同症，同性恋特质与工业社会的科层制组织形式以及资本主义的竞争性人格和商业精神格格不入。在“文化失范”和“道德恐慌”的压力下，社会倾向于将性越轨视为社会失序的象征，同性恋群体成为“社会病态”的替罪羊。在文化阐释的范式看来，恐同症是“性别主义的武器”，同性恋对居于支配地位的性别意识形态构成了威胁，攻击同性恋者有助于强化既存的性别阶级结构，因而恐同症成为对性别越轨行为的社会控制形式。

关键词： 同性恋, 恐同症, 宗教, 现代性, 角色规范

Abstract: Usually western religion was considered as the primary reason of homophobia,but actually homosexual activities were disciplined as non-reproductive heterosexual behavior in the religious discourse and moral practices.Modernity contributes to the gay identity while generating anti-homosexual condition,bureaucracy in modern organization and capitalist personality and spirits were contradicted with gayness.Under the pressure of cultural anomie and moral panic,the society would treat sexual deviance as symbol of social disorganization,then gay minority become the scapegoat of social illness.In the perspective of cultural interpretation,homophobia was regarded as weapons of sexism,and gay minority threats the dominated gender ideology,assaulting gay would help to strength the existing gender structure.And homophobia was believed as the social control of gender deviance.

Key words: homosexual, homophobia, religion, modernity, role norm

王晴锋 . “恐同症”的根源——基于宗教、现代性和文化的阐释[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(1): 59-64.

WANG Qing-Feng- . The Roots of Homophobia:from Perspectives of Religion,Modernity and Culture[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, 2013, 34(1): 59-64.

参考文献

[1] PETER BROWN.The Body and Society:Men,Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity[M].New York:Columbia University,1988.

[2] JOHN BOSWELL.Categories,Experience and Sexuality[M]//STEIN E.Forms of Desire.NY:Garland Publishing,1990.

[3] JOHN BOSWELL.Christianity,Social Tolerance,and Homosexuality[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1980.

[4] HALPERIN D.One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love[M].NY:Routledge,1990.

[5] JOHN D’EMILIO.Making Trouble:Essays on Gay History,Politics,and the University[M].Routledge,1992.

[6] DAVID GREENBERG,BYSTRYN M.Capitalism,Bureaucracy,and Male Homosexuality[J].Contemporary Crimes:Crime,Law and Social Policy,1984(8).

[7] SULLIVAN G.Variations on a Common Theme? Gay and Lesbian Identity and Community in Asia [M]//SULLIVAN G,JACKSON P.Gay and Lesbian Asia.NY:Harrington Park Press,2001.

[8] 〖JP4〗JEFFREY WEEKS.Sex,Politics,and Society:The Regulation of Sexuality Since 1800[M].London:Longmans,1981.

[9] ADAM B.Structural Foundation of the Gay World[J].Comparative Studies in Society and History,1985(27).

[10] KAREN FRANKLIN.未曾言明的动机：将反同性恋攻击者所做的告白情境化[M]//GREGORY M HEREK.污名与性取向.江淑琳,译.台北：韦伯文化,2000.

[11] HEREK G M.Beyond Homophobia:A Social Psychological Perspective on Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay men[J].Journal of Homosexuality,1984(10).

[12] MARY E KITE,BERNARD E WHITLEY.女性与男性异性恋对同性恋的态度是否有差异？一个概念上和方法论上的分析[M]//GREGORY M HEREK.污名与性取向.江淑琳,译.台北：韦伯文化,2000.

[13] MCCORMICK N B.Come-ons and Put-offs:Unmarried Students’ Strategies for Having and Avoiding Sexual Intercourse[J].Psychology of Women Quarterly,1979(4).

[14] MILLHAM J,WEINBERGER L E.Sexual Preference,Sex Role Appropriateness,and Restriction of Social Access[J].Journal of Homosexuality,1977(2).

[15] PLUMMER K.Homosexual Categories:Some Research Problems in the Labeling Perspective of Homosexuality[M]//KENNETH PLUMMER.The Making of the Modern Homosexual.London:Hutchinson,1981.