城市风险事件中专家和公众风险感知的内在张力——基于兰州“4·11”自来水苯超标事件的研究

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2019.03.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：在环境风险的治理中，公众与专家在风险感知上存在较大差异。我国工业化、城市化高速发展带来的环境风险已成现实问题，其中危害城市生产生活用水安全的风险最为引人关注。以兰州市“4·11”自来水苯超标事件为例，采用现有研究常用的风险特征量表，测量不同群体对这一特定事件的风险感知并进行综合比较。研究认为：风险感知在学理结构上可分为风险影响、风险接受、风险控制和风险认识四个维度，公众对风险的总体感知显著高于专家；针对专家与公众在知识体系、沟通机制、价值目标等维度上产生风险感知差异的原因，需要通过信息共享、推动公民参与、舆论有效引导等措施以减少专家与公众风险感知差异，化解潜在的稳定风险。

关键词： 风险感知, 城市风险, 差异

Abstract: In the governance of environmental risk,there are great differences between the public and experts in risk perception.The environmental risk caused by the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization in China has become a real problem,and water risk,which endangers the safety of urban production and life,has attracted the most attention.This paper,taking the event of excessive benzene in tap water in Lanzhou City on April 11 as an example,using the existing risk characteristic scale,measures the risk perception of different groups to this particular event,and makes a comprehensive comparison between them.The study holds that risk perception can be divided into four dimensions:risk impact,risk acceptance,risk control and risk recognition.The overall perception of risk by the public is significantly higher than that by experts.In view of the reasons for the differences in risk perception in the dimensions of knowledge system,communication mechanism,value objectives and so on,it is necessary to reduce the difference of risk perception between experts and the public and resolve the potential stability risks through information sharing,promoting citizen participation,and effective guidance of public opinion and so on.

Key words: risk perception, city risks, differences

文宏，陈路雪，张书. 城市风险事件中专家和公众风险感知的内在张力——基于兰州“4·11”自来水苯超标事件的研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2019.03.017.

WEN Hong,CHEN Luxue,ZHANG Shu. The Internal Tension of Expert and Public Risk Perception in Urban Risk Event:a Case Study of Excessive Benzene in Tap Water in Lanzhou City[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2019.03.017.

参考文献

[1] MCDANIELS T L,AXELROD L J,CAVANAGH N S,et al.Perception of Ecological Risk to Water Environments[J].Risk Analysis,1997,17(3):341-52. [2] KRIMSKY B S,GOLDING D.Social Theories of Risk[J].Routledge Handbook of Social & Cultural Theory,2014:157-174. [3] O'CONNOR R E,BORD R J,FISHER A.Perceptions of Fresh Water[J].National Geographic Research and Exploration,1994,10(3):318-341. [4] 胡象明，王锋.一个新的社会稳定风险评估分析框架：风险感知的视角[J].中国行政管理，2014(4):102-108. [5] SJBERG L,DROTTZ-SJBERG B M.Knowledge and Risk Perception Among Nuclear Power Plant Employees[J].Risk Analysis An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis,1991,11(4):607-618. [6] KUNG Y W,CHEN S H.Perception of Earthquake Risk in Taiwan:Effects of Gender and Past Earthquake Experience[J].Risk Analysis,2012,32(9):1535-46. [7] KNUTH D,KEHL D,HULSE L,et al.Risk Perception,Experience,and Objective Risk:A Cross-National Study with European Emergency Survivors[J].Risk Analysis,2014,34(7):1286-1298. [8] WHITFIELD S C,ROSA E A,DAN A,DIETZ T.The Future of Nuclear Power:Value Orientations and Risk Perception[J].Risk Analysis,2009,29(3):425-437. [9] LU X,XIE X F,XIONG J.Social Trust and Risk Perception of Genetically Modified Food in Urban Areas of China:the Role of Salient Value Similarity[J].Journal of Risk Research,2015,18(2):199-214. [10] 王娟，胡志强.专家与公众的风险感知差异[J].自然辩证法研究，2014(1)：49-53. [11] SLOVIC P.Perception of risk[J].Science,1987,236(3):280-285. [12] 李华强，范春梅，贾建民，等.突发性灾害中的公众风险感知与应急管理——以5·12汶川地震为例[J].管理世界，2009(6):52-60. [13] 刘岩，赵延东.转型社会下的多重复合性风险三城市公众风险感知状况的调查分析[J].社会，2011(4)：175-194. [14] 王甫勤.风险社会与当前中国民众的风险认知研究[J].上海行政学院学报,2010(2):83-91. [15] SLOVIC P,FISCHHOFF B,LICHTENSTEIN S.Rating the Risks:The Structure of Expert and Lay Perceptions[M]//Environmental Impact Assessment,Technology Assessment,and Risk Analysis.Springer Berlin Heidelberg,1985：131-156. [16] KRAUS N,MALMFORS T,SLOVIC P.Intuitive Toxicology:Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks[J].Risk Analysis,1994,22(2):198-201. [17] SLOVIC P,MALMFORS T,KREWSKI D,et al.Intuitive Toxicology.II.Expert and Lay Judgments of Chemical Risks in Canada[J].Risk Analysis,1995,15(6):661-675. [18] FLYNN J,SLOVIC P.Expert and Public Evaluations of Technological Risks:Searching for Common Ground[J].Risk,1999，10（4）：333-358. [19] FLYNN J,SLOVIC P,MERTZ C K.Decidedly Different:Expert and Public Views of Risks from a Radioactive Waste Repository[J].Risk Analysis,2006,13(6):643-648. [20] MCDANIELS T L,AXELROD L J,CAVANAGH N S,et al.Perception of Ecological Risk to Water Environments[J].Risk Analysis,1997,17(3):341-52. [21] MERTZ C K,SLOVIC P,PURCHASE I F H.Judgments of Chemical Risks:Comparisons Among Senior Managers,Toxicologists,and the Public[J].Risk Analysis,1998,18(4):391-404. [22] SIEGRIST M,GUTSCHER H.Flooding Risks:A Comparison of Lay People's Perceptions and Expert's Assessments in Switzerland[J].Risk Analysis,2006,26(4):971-979. [23] PURVIS-ROBERTS K L,WERNER C A,FRANK I.Perceived Risks from Radiation and Nuclear Testing Near Semipalatinsk,Kazakhstan:A Comparison Between Physicians,Scientists,and the Public[J].Risk Analysis an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis,2007,27(2):291-302. [24] MORUA A R,HALVORSEN K E,MAYER A S.Waterborne Disease-Related Risk Perceptions in the Sonora River Basin,Mexico[J].Risk Analysis,2011,31(5):866-78. [25] ROWE G,WRIGHT G.Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk:Myth or Reality?[J].Risk Analysis,2001,21(2):341-356. [26] LAZO J K,KINNELL J C,ANN F.Expert and Layperson Perceptions of Ecosystem Risk[J].Risk Analysis,2000,20(2):179-93. [27] HORA S C.Acquisition of Expert Judgment:Examples from Risk Assessment[J].Journal of Energy Engineering,1992,118(2):136-148. [28] 陈顺宇.多变量分析[M].台北：华泰书局，2005. [30] LEACH M,SCOONES I,WYNNE B.Science and Citizens:Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement[M].London:Zed Books,2005：28. [31] 邹霞.风险放大的四级判定框架——基于SARF的理论拓展及典型案例的放大检视[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,38(10):160-165. [32] 张海柱.环境风险治理中的知识生产与公众参与[J].人文杂志,2018(1):103-111. [33] 王芳.不确定性与脱嵌:环境风险生成中的科技失灵[J].华东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2016(4):1-8. [34] DOYLE A.Trust，Citizenship and Exclusion in the Risk Society.In Risk and Trust:Including or Excluding Citizens?[M].Winnipeg:Fernwood Publishing Company Limited,2007:10. [35] IRWIN A,WYNNE B.Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press，1996:2. [36] 肖巍,钱箭星.环境风险中的科技缺陷[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2008(1):40-47. [37] GRUNDMANN R,STEHR N.Social Control and Knowledge in Democratic Societies[J].Science and Public Policy,2003,30(3):186. [38] 周桂田.风险社会——公共治理与公民参与[M].台北:五南图书出版公司，2014:68. [39] BUCCHI M.Beyond Technocracy:Science，Politics and Citizens[M].Translated by ADRIAN BELTON.New York:Springer Science ＆ Business Media，2009:2. [40] 张海柱.科技论争与公众参与:环境风险研究中的公民身份议题[J].公共行政评论,2017(5):86-104;217-218. [41] 刘鹏.风险社会与行政国家再造:一个行政学的阐释框架[J].学海,2017(3):69-76. [42] ALAN I.Citizen Science:A Study of People，Expertise，and Sustainable Development[M].London:Routledge，1995:34.