现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的多维结构——基于类属分析的探索性研究

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.04.004

吉首大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 29-39.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.04.004

• 社会治理·治理标准化专题 • 上一篇下一篇

现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的多维结构——基于类属分析的探索性研究

吴子靖

（东北大学文法学院，辽宁沈阳 110169）

出版日期:2023-07-01 发布日期:2023-08-17
作者简介:吴子靖，男，博士，东北大学文法学院讲师。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金重大项目（21ZDA110）

Multi-dimensional Structure of the Quality Standard System of Modern Urban Community Governance—An Exploratory Study Based on Categorization Analysis

WU Zijing

(School of Humanities and Law,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China)

Online:2023-07-01 Published:2023-08-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要：应用类属分析这一探索性研究手段，对基于深度访谈所获得的全国10个城市36个社区的质性数据进行编码分析，充分揭示了现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的多维结构以及互动机理。研究发现，现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系包含三个核心维度：“五位一体”多元行动主体协同共治的主体要素核心维度，“软硬件”充分有机结合的条件要素核心维度和侧重居民整体满意度感知评价的结果要素核心维度。现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的核心维度内部结构较为稳定，呈现出“主体—条件—结果”三维链式传导结构互动关系，但是构成核心维度的不同要素之间并非固定排列组合，而是呈现出高度复杂的非线性动态匹配的时变特点，这彰显了现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系“稳中有变”的时代特质。

关键词： 现代化, 城市社区治理, 质量标准体系, 多维结构体系, 类属分析

Abstract: By using the exploratory research method of categorization analysis,this paper makes a coding analysis of the qualitative data of 36 communities in 10 cities in China based on in-depth interviews,which fully reveals the multi-dimensional structure and interactive mechanism of the quality standard system of modern urban community governance.It is found that the quality standard system of modern urban community governance contains three core dimensions:the core dimension of the "five-in-one" multi-actor co-governance,the core dimension of the conditional elements of the full organic combination of "hardware and software",and the core dimension of the result elements focusing on the perception and evaluation of residents' overall satisfaction.The internal structure of the core dimension of the modern urban community governance quality standard system is relatively stable,showing a three-dimensional chain conduction structure interaction relationship of "subject-condition-result".However,the different elements constituting the core dimension are not fixed arrangement and combination,but show the time-varying characteristics of highly complex nonlinear dynamic matching.This proves that the modern urban community governance quality standard system is "stable while changing".

Key words: modernization, urban community governance, quality evaluation standard system, multidimensional structural system, categorization analysis

吴子靖. 现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的多维结构——基于类属分析的探索性研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 44(4): 29-39.

WU Zijing. Multi-dimensional Structure of the Quality Standard System of Modern Urban Community Governance—An Exploratory Study Based on Categorization Analysis[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 44(4): 29-39.

参考文献

[1] MAWN B,BRADLY J.Standards of Care for High-Risk Prenatal Clients:The Community Nurse Case Management Approach[J].Public Health Nursing,2010(2):78-88.
[2] SCHNEIDER H,NXUMALO N.Leadership and governance of community health worker programmes at scale：a cross case analysis of provincial implementation in South Africa[J].International Journal for Equity in Health,2017(1)：72-74.
[3] D'ABBS P,SCHMIDT B,DOUGHERTY K,et al.Implementing a chronic disease strategy in two remote Indigenous Australian settings：a multi-method pilot evaluation[J].Australian Journal of Rural Health,2008(2)：67-69.
[4] 吴子靖,顾爱华.国外社区准备评估模型对社会治理的启示[J].中国行政管理,2020(1):155-157.
[5] EDWARDS R W,JUMPER-THURMAN P,PLESTES B A,et al.Community readiness:Research to practice[J].Journal of Community Psychology,2000(3):291-307.
[6] STEWART K.Designing good urban governance indicators：The importance of citizen participation and its evaluation in Greater Vancouver[J].Cities,2006（3）：196-204.
[7] BEETHAM D.Political Participation,Mass Protest and Representative Democracy[J].Parliamentary Affairs,2003(4):597-609.
[8] MEANS R,BURTON P,DAVIES T,et al.Implementation of social in labor market policy:The case of black youth,equal opportunities and the youth training scheme[J].Policy and Politics,1985(1):71-84.
[9] ROWE G,FREWER L J.Public Participation Methods：A Framework for evaluation[J].Science Technology and Human Value,2019（1）：3-29.
[10] BURTON P.Conceptual,Theoretical and Practical Issues in Measuring the Benefits of Public Participation[J].Evaluation,2009（3）：263-284.
[11] ZHENG H W，SHEN G Q，SONG Y，et al.Neighborhood sustainability in urban renewal：An assessment framework[J].Environment & Planning ，2017（5）:12-13.
[12] 李晓梅.城市社区治理质量的属性、内涵和评价维度——基于社会行动系统论的分析框架[J].行政论坛,2021(1):113-118.
[13] NGUYEN P T,WELLS S,NGUYEN N.A Systemic Indicators Framework for Sustainable Rural Community Development[J].Systemic Practice and Action Research,2019(3):1-18.
[14] 吴子靖,张平.城市社区治理效果的影响因素及其作用机理——基于20个城市1 089个社区的调查数据[J].探索,2022（4）:120.
[15] 张青波,童浩文.“放管服”改革中行政权力下放的风险与对策[J].华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）,2022(5):52.
[16] 冷向明,肖瑶.“遴选赛”:社区治理创新“逐顶竞争”的组织机制研究——基于W市N街道的案例[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2023(1):21.
[17] 刘春湘,姜耀辉.社会组织参与养老服务的逻辑框架:制度环境·主体类型·实践方式[J].吉首大学学报（社会科学版），2020(5)：38.
[18] 张大维.社区治理中协商系统的条件、类型与质量辨识——基于6个社区协商实验案例的比较[J].探索,2020(6):53.
[19] 刘江,顾东辉,肖梦希.满意度能作为社会服务效果评价指标吗?——基于一项政府购买社会服务项目的量化分析[J].华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2022(1):6.

现代化城市社区治理质量标准体系的多维结构——基于类属分析的探索性研究

Multi-dimensional Structure of the Quality Standard System of Modern Urban Community Governance—An Exploratory Study Based on Categorization Analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李建森, 翟乐. 中国式现代化生态文明创造及时代超越性[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 43(3): 21-30.
[2]	杜玉华, 王晓真. 中国式现代化道路的理论基础、历史进程及实践转向[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 43(3): 14-20.