吉首大学学报(社会科学版)

• 文学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

除了“阐释”,文学理论还能干什么?

陈莉   

  1. (中央民族大学 文学与新闻传播学院,北京 100081)
  • 出版日期:2016-03-01 发布日期:2016-04-28
  • 作者简介:陈莉,女,博士,中央民族大学文学与新闻传播学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(14FZW055)

What Else Can Literary Theories Do Besides“Interpretation”?

CHEN Li   

  1. (College of Literature and Journalism,Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081,China)
  • Online:2016-03-01 Published:2016-04-28

摘要:

“阐释”是对既有文学现象和理论现象的解释,是文学理论研究中的重要研究方法。“文化诗学”和“文学理论的批评化”的实质都是对作家、作品及文学现象进行“阐释”。避免以前在立场和模式对文学现象进行“强制阐释”,追求“对话性阐释”、“适度阐释”是文论界的共识。“阐释”的过程中虽然也会有理论观点和理论态度,但“阐释”的侧重点却不在于面对纷繁的文学现象提出新的理论话题。中国文学理论研究的危机并不仅仅在于“强制阐释”,而在于“阐释”本身。对“阐释”的较多关注,对新的理论建构的有意回避,是导致文学理论研究缺乏个性和创新的重要原因。

关键词: 文学理论, 危机, 阐释, 理论建构, 创新

Abstract:

As an important research method of literary theory,“interpretation” is the explanation to existing literary phenomena and theories.The essence of “cultural poetics” and “criticism to of literary theories” is the interpretation to the writers,works and literary phenomena.It is generally acknowledged in the field of literary theory that dialogical interpretation and moderate interpretation should be adapted,avoiding previous standpoints and modes to give forceful interpretation.Though containing theoretical perspectives and theoretical attitudes,the emphasis of interpretation is not on proposing new theoretical topics and constructing new theories.The crisis in the research of Chinese literary theories lies not in the forceful interpretation,but in interpretation itself.Too much attention to interpretation,rather than to new theoretical construction,is an important reason for the lack of individuality and innovation in the research of literary theories.

Key words: literary theories, crisis, interpretation, theoretical construction, innovation

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ