符号正义与公共行政 ——基于语言游戏的正义视角

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.02.004

吉首大学学报（社会科学版）

符号正义与公共行政 ——基于语言游戏的正义视角

[美]查尔斯·F·阿贝尔，亚瑟·J·塞门特里/著，李钊/译

(1.美国斯蒂芬奥斯汀州立大学政府系,纳科多奇斯 75962；2.美国亚特兰大大学公共管理学院，亚特兰大 30314；3.华中科技大学公共管理学院，湖北武汉 430074；4.美国哥伦比亚大学国际与公共事务学院，纽约 10027)

出版日期:2020-03-01 发布日期:2020-04-13
作者简介:查尔斯·F·阿贝尔(Charles F. Abel)，男，美国斯蒂芬奥斯汀州立大学政府系终身教授；亚瑟·J·塞门特里(Arthur J. Sementelli)，男，美国亚特兰大大学公共管理学院终身教授。
基金资助:
教育部重大课题攻关项目（14JZD002）；国家社会科学基金重大委托项目（16ZZD046）

Semiotic Justice in Public Administration：Justice Perspective Based on Language Games

Written by Charles F. Abel,Arthur J. Sementelli,Translated by LI Zhao

(1.Department of Government,Stephen F. Austin State University,Nacogdoches 75962 U. S. A;2.School of Public Administration,Atlanta University,Atlanta 30314,U. S. A;3.School of Public Administration,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;4.School of International and Public Affairs,Columbia University,New York 10027 U. S. A)

Online:2020-03-01 Published:2020-04-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：公共行政是正义研究的重要领域。传统理论多采用罗尔斯、诺齐克和沃尔泽等人为正义提供的客观标准。但这些标准不仅在理论上相互冲突，而且在公共行政的实践中也常常会导致模棱两可的判断。本研究旨在提出一种符号正义的观念，来指导当代公共行政的理论与实践。这种观念认为正义并不存在中立客观的标准，而是被群体共享的信念和实践所建构。研究者只有将正义置于特定语言游戏的背景中，才能真正理解其发生和运作。因为和正义相关的不同语言游戏之间只存在家族相似性，所以公共行政必须面对相互冲突的复杂环境。符号正义的观念能够为这种公共行政问题的复杂性提供必不可少的分析框架。

关键词： 正义, 符号正义, 公共行政, 语言游戏, 家族相似性, 利益共同体

Abstract: Public administration is an important area of justice research.The traditional theory mainly adopts the objective criterion provided by Rawls,Nozick and Walzer for justice.However,these standards not only conflict with each other in theory,but also often lead to ambiguous judgments in the practice of public administration.The purpose of this study is to propose a concept of justice in semiotics to guide the theory and practice of contemporary public administration.This concept holds that justice does not have a neutral and objective standard,but is constructed by the beliefs and practices shared by the group.Researchers can understand the occurrence and operation of justice only by placing this concept in the context of a specific language game.Because there are only family similarities between different types of language games related to justice,public administration must face complex and conflicting environments.The concept of justice in semiotics not only provides an essential analytical framework for this complexity,but also reshapes the nature of work in the field of public administration.

Key words: Justice, semiotic justice, public adminstration, Language game, family similarity, community of interests

[美]查尔斯·F·阿贝尔，亚瑟·J·塞门特里/著，李钊/译. 符号正义与公共行政 ——基于语言游戏的正义视角[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.02.004.

Written by Charles F. Abel,Arthur J. Sementelli,Translated by LI Zhao. Semiotic Justice in Public Administration：Justice Perspective Based on Language Games[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.02.004.

参考文献

[1] ROTH G,WITTICH C,eds.Max Weber,Economy and Society[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1978. [2] FAYOL H.General and Industrial Management[M].Belmont,CA:Pittman Learning,1987. [3] SIMON H,THOMPSON V,SMITHBURG D.Public Administration[M].Piscataway,NJ:Transaction Publishers,2000. [4] BINGHAM R,BOWEN W."Mainstream" Public Administration Over Time:A Topical Content Analysis of Public Administration Review[J].Public Administration Review,1994,54(2):204-208. [5] FINER H.Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government[J].Public Administration Review,1941,1(4):335-350. [6] ROHR J.Ethics for Bureaucrats:An Essay on Law and Values[M].New York:Marcel Dekker Inc,1989. [7] LOWI T.The End of the Republican Era[M].Norman:University of Oklahoma Press,1995. [8] BELLAH R,MADSEN R,SULLIVAN W,et al.Habits of the Heart:Individualism and Commitment in American Life (updated edition)[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1996. [9] BERLIN I.Four Essays on Liberty[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1969. [10] HOBBES T.Leviathan[M].New York:Touchstone Books,1997.GAWTHROP L.The Human Side of Public Administration[J].PS:Political Science and Politics,1998,31(4):763-769. [11] KETTL D.The Transformation of Governance:Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America[M].Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press,2002. [12] GUPTA D.Analyzing Public Policy:Concepts,Tools,and Techniques[M].Washington,DC:Congressional Quarterly Press,2001. [13] KABOOLIAN L.The New Public Management:Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs.Administration Debate[J].Public Administration Review,1998,58(3):189-193. [14] KABOOLIAN L.The New Public Management:Challenging the Boundaries of the Management vs.Administration Debate[J].Public Administration Review，1998，58(3):189-193. [15] MARINI F.Toward a New Public Administration:The Minnowbrook Perspective[M].Scranton,PA:Chandler Publishing,1971. [16] KING C,STIVERS C.Government Is Us:Public Administration in an Anti Government Era[M].Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage Publications,1998. [17] THOMPSON V.Without Sympathy or Enthusiasm:The Problem of Administrative Compassion[M].Tuscaloosa:University of Alabama Press,1975. [18] KERWIN C.Rulemaking:How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy[M].Washington,DC:Congressional Quarterly Press,1994:2. [19] WALZER M.Politics and Passion:Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism[M].New Haven,CT:Yale University Press,2004. [20] SEMENTELLI A,ABEL C F.Recasting Critical Theory:Veblen,Deconstruction,and the Theory-Praxis Gap[J].Administrative Theory & Praxis,2000,22(3):458-478. [21] WALZER M.Politics and Passion:Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism[M].New Haven,CT:Yale University Press,2004. [22] WITTGENSTEIN,L.Philosophical Investigations[M].Oxford:Blackwell Publishing,1953. [23] WALZER M.Spheres of Justice:A Defense of Pluralism and Equality[M].New York:Basic Books,1983:312. [24] BLACKMORE S.The Meme Machine[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1999. [25] ABEL C,SEMENTELLI A.Evolutionary Critical Theory and Its Role in Public Affairs[M].Armonk,NY:M.E.Sharpe,2003. [26] RAWLS J.Justice as Fairness[M].New York:Irvington Press,1991. [27] MIKULINCER M,SHAVER P.Attachment Theory and Intergroup Bias:Evidence That Priming the Secure Base Schema Attenuates Negative Reactions to Out Groups[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2001,81(1):97-115. [28] GALLIE W.Essentially Contested Concepts[M].KASSMAN A A.Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,1956,56(167-198). [29] BARNES J.Aristotle,The Politics[M].New York:Oxford University Press,1998.

符号正义与公共行政 ——基于语言游戏的正义视角

Semiotic Justice in Public Administration：Justice Perspective Based on Language Games

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	谭九生, 胡健雄. 以人民为中心的行政公平观及其建构路径[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2022, 43(2): 84-95.
[2]	李志武. 从行政主体到功能标准：政府信息公开义务主体制度的反思与重构[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 42(2): 143-154.
[3]	胡中华，吴帅帅. 社会正义视域下碳排放权初始额度分配规则之选择[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 41(1): 59-71.
[4]	刘海龙. 邻避冲突的生成与化解：环境正义的视角[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2018, 39(2): 57-63.
[5]	郁乐. 环境正义的分配、矫正与承认及其内在逻辑[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2017, 38(2): 43-49.
[6]	(英）乔纳森·沃尔夫/著，易小明/译. 全球正义与健康——全球健康责任的基础[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 37(6): 1-11.
[7]	刘建华. 边疆民族地区网络舆情危机中的社会怨恨情绪研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 37(4): 45-51.
[8]	王雨辰, 游琴. 基于“反思平衡”方法的环境正义论——评彼得·S·温茨的“同心圆”理论[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2016, 37(1): 40-49.
[9]	龚群. 何为政治哲学[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 35(5): 14-19.
[10]	彭本利. 气候正义是气候治理的基础[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 35(4): 28-33.
[11]	邹海贵. 全球正义：是否可能？何以可能？[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2014, 35(1): 31-36.
[12]	刘海江. 自由、平等和社群——评威尔·金里卡对马克思正义批判理论的质疑[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(4): 48-53.
[13]	毛勒堂. 分配正义视野下的社会管理检讨[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(2): 13-18.
[14]	张力, 郑志峰. 私法中身份的社会化变迁——兼论农民身份利益的实现[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(2): 35-45.
[15]	樊凡. 正义与民主之争——基于古典政治哲学的研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(1): 85-91.