| [1] Frye v.United States,293 F.D.C.Cir.1923. [2] People v.Kelly，163Cal.App.3d,1976. [3] Howard Coleman and Eric Swenson.DNA in the Courtroom[M]. Washington: Gene Lex Press Seattle，1994. [4] Judge Harvey Brown.Eight Gates for Expert Witnesses.36Hours.Law.Review,1999. [5] Bert Black et al.,Science and the Law in the Wake of Daubert: A New Search for Scientific Knowledge,72 Tex.L.Rev.1994. [6] Fredric I.Lederer, Resolving the Frye Dilemma—A Reliability Approach,26 JURIMETRICS J.1986. [7] Philip H.Dixon,Recent Developments,64 CORNELL L.REV.1979. [8] Bert Black,A Unified Theory of Scientific Evidence,56 Fordham L.Rev.1988. [9] [美]霍华德·科曼，艾利克·史威森，法庭上的DNA[M].何美莹,译.台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司,1999. [10] Daubert v.Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals,Inc.,113 S.Ct.1993. [11] Lawrence Kobilinsky,Thomas F Liotti,Jamel Oeser-Sweat,DNA Forensic and Legal Applications,John Wiley & Sons. [12] General Electric Co.V.Joiner522 US.1997. [13] Kumho Tire Co.,Ltd.v.Carmichae,l 119S.Ct.1999. [14] 梁玉霞.论司法鉴定权威胁的程序保障[J].中国司法鉴定,2006(1). [15] [美]罗纳德·J·艾伦.证据法:文本、-和案例[M].张保生,等,译.北京:高等教育出版社,2006. [16] Bert Black,Improving Judicial Gate￣keeping: Technical Advisors and Scientific Evidence,110 Harv.L.Rev.1997. [17] Larry Kramer(ed.).Reforming the Civil，Justice system [J].New York University Press，1996. [18] See Paul S.Milich,Controversial Science in the Courtroom: Daubert and the Law’s Hubris,43 Emory L.J.1994. [19] David E.Bernstein & Jeffrey D.Jackson,The Daubert Trilogy in the States,44 JURIMETRICS J.2004. [20] Michael J.Saks,The Aftermath of Daubert: An Evolving Jurisprudence of Expert Evidence,40 JURIMETRICS J.2000. |
