吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 35-40.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于我国刑事诉讼贯彻直接言词原则的思考

  

  1. (广东省人民检察院 广州铁路运输分院,广东 广州 510088)
  • 出版日期:2007-03-15 发布日期:2012-06-08
  • 作者简介:董亚平(1952-),男,浙江宁波人,广东省人民检察院广州铁路运输分院检察长。

Reflections on Carrying out the Principle of Direct Verbal Trial in Criminal Action in Our Country

  1. (Branch Court of Guangzhou Railage,People’s Prosecutorial Office of Guangdong Province,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510088,China)
  • Online:2007-03-15 Published:2012-06-08

摘要:直接言词原则是现代刑事诉讼基本原则之一,它在许多国家刑事诉讼实践中得到了贯彻。虽然我国刑事诉讼法及有关司法解释的一些规定也体现了直接言词原则的精神,但由于立法上、司法实践上存在贯彻执行这一原则的障碍,使得这一原则在我国刑事诉讼中成了一种摆设。因而,在我国要贯彻直接言词原则,必须建立证人等出庭的制度,限制书面言词证据的使用,进一步加强庭审方式的改革,强化庭审的功能。从剖析我国贯彻这一原则的障碍入手,提出了在我国贯彻直接言词原则的设想。

关键词: 直接言词, 出庭作证, 证据规则

Abstract: The principle of direct verbal trial is a basic modern principle in criminal action,which is carried out in the practice of criminal action in many countries.Though the criminal law and some relevant explanations in our country have embodied the principle of direct verbal trial,this principle is not totally carried out due to the obstacles in legislation and judicial practice.Therefore,to carry out this principle in our country,we must set up a system to require the witness to appear in court,restrict the written oral evidence,and reform the ways of court trials.This paper,starting from analyzing the obstacles,proposes some assumptions to carry out this principle.

Key words: direct wordage, appear in court as a witness, rule of evidence

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ