吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 114-118.

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

关于行政合同理论的几点思考

  

  1. (武汉大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2005-01-15 发布日期:2012-08-12
  • 作者简介:涂四益(1969-),男,湖南华容人,武汉大学法学院行政法专业硕士研究生。

Some Thoughts About Administrative Contract Theory

  1. (Law Collge of Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072 Hubei)
  • Online:2005-01-15 Published:2012-08-12

摘要:行政合同应以具有法律约束力为前提,如一方违约,另一方应有权获得法律救济。并非行政机关为执行职务而达成的协议均为行政合同,具有隶属关系的行政机关之间更不会形成行政合同。我国行政法采用的行政主体理论与德国行政合同所依托的行政主体理论不同,不能简单地套用德国关于行政合同的分类。在行政合同的范围上,相比德国而言,法国的理论更为优越。

关键词: 行政合同, 事实上的合同, 法律上的合同, 行政主体, 对等权行政合同

Abstract: Administrative contract should be under the prerequisite of having law engagements,one party,for instance,breaks a contract,another party should have the right to obtain the law to relieve .It is not that the agreement which the administrative organ reaches in order to carry out the post is the administrative contract,will not form the administrative contract between the administrative organs with membership.The administrative subject theory that the administrative law of our country adopts is different from administrative subject theory that Germany's administrative contract relies on,can't apply mechanically the classification about the administrative contract of Germany briefly.At administrative range of contract,France‘s theory is superior to Germany’s.

Key words: Administrative contract, Contract in fact, Contract in law, Administrative subject, Reciprocity administrative contract of right

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ