吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 31-40.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2021.05.004

• “信息时代的刑事司法应对”专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

刑事司法领域信息自决权研究

刘玫,陈慧君   

  1. (中国政法大学 刑事司法学院,北京 100088)
  • 出版日期:2021-09-01 发布日期:2021-11-01
  • 作者简介:刘玫,女,博士,中国政法大学刑事司法学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CFX032);中国政法大学横向科研项目(1041-23618130)

Research on the Right to Self-Determination of Information in Criminal Justice

LIU Mei,CHEN Huijun   

  1. (School of Criminal Justice,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
  • Online:2021-09-01 Published:2021-11-01

摘要:信息自决权是一项独立的人格权利,其与个人隐私权、通信秘密权等传统的隐私性权利不同。我国《民法典》确定了独立的个人信息权利,《刑法》规定了侵犯公民个人信息罪。我国刑事司法领域规定对个人信息的保密与保护义务,但缺少对干预信息自决权的前提和违法干预后法律后果的明确规范,不仅有侵害被追诉人权利的风险,而且可能导致司法实践对违法干预所获得证据的证据能力意见不一。公安司法机关在侦查犯罪过程中需要干预信息自决权时,应当遵循合法性、比例性、最后手段性与安全性原则,并采取外部审批程序、履行通知义务、促进权利人实现其信息查询权利等保障措施,同时,违法干预的侦查行为还应当受到程序性制裁。

关键词: 信息, 信息自决权, 刑事司法, 人格性权利, 隐私性权利, 隐私权, 个人信息权

Abstract: The right to self-determination of information is an independent personality right,which is different from the traditional privacy rights such as personal privacy and communication secrets.The Civil Code of China defines the independent right to personal information,and the Criminal Law stipulates the crime of infringing upon citizens' personal information.The duty of confidentiality and protection of personal information is stipulated in the field of criminal justice in our country.However,there still exists a lack of clear norms on the premise of interfering with the right to self-determination of information and the legal effect after illegal intervention,which not only carries the risk of infringing upon the rights of the accused,but also may lead to different opinions in judicial practice on the ability of evidence obtained by illegal intervention.If the police and judical organs interfere with the right to self-determination of information in the process of investigating crimes,they should follow the principles of legality,proportionality,last resort and security,adopt external examination and approval procedures,fulfill the obligation of notification,and promote the right holders to realize their right to inquire information.The investigation acts of illegal intervention should also be subject to procedural sanctions.

Key words: information, right to self-determination of information, criminal justice, qualified rights, privacy rights, rights of privacy, personal information right

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ