吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 102-111.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.06.012

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

产业政策限制竞争法律规制的理论逻辑与制度路径

李平,刘桂清   

  1. (1.华中科技大学 马克思主义学院,湖北 武汉 430074;2.中南财经政法大学 法学院,湖北 武汉 430073)
  • 出版日期:2020-11-01 发布日期:2020-12-25
  • 作者简介:李平,女,博士,华中科技大学马克思主义学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科基金规划项目(17YJA820013)

The Theoretical Logic and Institutional Path of the Legal Regulation of Industrial Policy Restricting Competition

LI Ping,LIU Guiqing   

  1. (1.School of Marxism,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China;2.School of Law,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
  • Online:2020-11-01 Published:2020-12-25

摘要:我国的传统产业政策存在政府过度干预和排除、限制市场竞争的缺憾。针对此问题,在推进产业政策向功能性政策方向转型的同时,也要注重发挥法律的规制作用。产业政策的权力干预本质、政策自身的内在缺陷以及政策手段的“侵害性”等限制竞争现象只有在法律规制之下才能得到较好的防范和控制。总体看,产业政策限制竞争的法律规制路径,主要包括产业政策立法、通过公平竞争审查制度推动的政府“自制”和行政垄断执法的外部监督三个方面。这三条制度路径在法律上都存在一定的不足,需要采取针对性措施予以完善。

关键词: 产业政策, 限制竞争, 法律规制, 理论逻辑, 制度路径

Abstract: Excessive government intervention,elimination and restriction of market competition exist in the traditional industrial policy of our country.In view of these problems,while promoting the transformation of industrial policy to functional policy,we should pay attention to the regulatory role of law.The nature of power intervention of industrial policy,the inherent defects of policy itself and the "aggressiveness" of policy means,which restrict competition,can be prevented only under legal regulation.On the whole,the legal regulation path of industrial policy restricting competition mainly includes three aspects:industrial policy legislation,government "self-control" promoted by fair competition review system,and external supervision of administrative monopoly law enforcement.These three institutional paths have some deficiencies in law,which need to be improved by targeted measures.

Key words: industrial policy, restricting competition, legal regulation, theoretical logic, institutional path

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ