吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 157-166.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.05.015

• 新时代 新青年 新学术:博士生论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

生成式人工智能的后真相递归效应及其批判

黄坤   

  1. (华南理工大学 马克思主义学院,广东 广州 510641)
  • 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-22
  • 作者简介:黄坤,男,华南理工大学马克思主义学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    贵州省哲学社会科学规划项目(23GZYB95)

The Post-Truth Recursive Effect of Generative Artificial Intelligence and a Critique

Huang Kun   

  1. (School of Marxism,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China)
  • Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-22

摘要:生成式人工智能的快速发展催生了后真相递归效应,这一效应本质上是数智时代技术异化、资本逻辑与意识形态操控深度耦合的产物。在技术层面,语料依赖与循环反馈使信息偏向在“生成—接收—再生成”过程中持续累积并放大;在资本层面,资本主义私有制条件下的数据集中与平台主导将认知活动纳入价值增殖过程,推动认知剥削由结果占有转向过程嵌入;在意识形态层面,算法中介通过选择性呈现与隐性引导,重组话语权力并固化认知结构。上述机制共同作用,使后真相递归效应在现实中表现为虚假信息链的病毒式传播、消费主义欲望的精准编程以及对历史虚无主义的助推。由此可见,后真相问题已由传播偏差演变为认知生产方式的结构性问题,其根源在于数字资本主义条件下智能技术的资本化运用,以及认知生产日益社会化与认知生产资料私人占有之间的矛盾。后真相递归效应由此成为资本逻辑向认知领域延伸并侵蚀主体自主性的集中表现。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 后真相, 递归效应, 认知异化, 信息, 算法, 意识形态

Abstract:

Rapid advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have given rise to the post-truth recursive effect. Essentially, it results from deep coupling among technological alienation, capital logic and ideological manipulation within the digital-intelligent era. At the technological level, corpus dependence and circular feedback allow informational bias to continuously accumulate and intensify throughout the generation-reception-and-regeneration process. At the capital level, data concentration and platform dominance under capitalist private ownership incorporate cognitive activities into value-augmentation processes, pushing cognitive exploitation from outcome appropriation toward in-process embedding. At the ideological level, algorithmic intermediaries reorganize discursive power and consolidate cognitive structures through selective presentation and implicit guidance. Combined, these mechanisms render the post-truth recursive effect practically visible through viral chains of disinformation, precise shaping of consumerist desires, and the incitement of historical nihilism. It follows that post-truth issues have evolved from communication bias toward structural problems embedded within cognitive-production modes. Their root causes lie in capitalized intelligent technologies under digital-capitalist conditions and in contradictions between increasingly socialized cognitive production and private ownership of cognitive-production means. Accordingly, the post-truth recursive effect serves as concentrated evidence of capital-logic expansion into cognitive spheres and of erosion over subject autonomy.


Key words: generative artificial intelligence, post-truth, recursive effect, cognitive alienation, information, algorithm, ideology

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ