吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 56-65.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.03.006

• “基层治理”专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层治理中的指标动员:治理逻辑与实践机制——基于苏南G县N镇的调查分析

丁波   

  1. (安徽大学 社会与政治学院,安徽 合肥 230601)
  • 出版日期:2026-05-01 发布日期:2026-06-02
  • 作者简介:丁波,男,博士,安徽大学社会与政治学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(25FSHB028)

Indicator Mobilization in Primary-Level Governance:Governance Logic and Practical Mechanisms—An Empirical Study of N Town in G County,Southern Jiangsu

DING Bo   

  1. (School of Sociology and Political Science,Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China)
  • Online:2026-05-01 Published:2026-06-02

摘要:国家高度重视整治形式主义为基层减负工作,“指标动员”是理解基层减负赋能、激励干部担当作为的重要视角。指标具有治理价值与功能,既是作为治理手段的指标,也是作为治理任务的指标,更是作为治理绩效的指标。指标动员遵循指标运作的治理逻辑,通过指标设置、分解、执行、考核等实践机制,推动工作任务分配、治理任务细化、中心工作下沉和工作目标完成,并以指标考核结果为导向,建立人员流动和岗位调整的行政激励与约束机制,进而实现基层治理的提质增效。指标动员作为基层治理的重要组织机制,一方面能够整合“条块”资源,调动基层工作人员的工作积极性,但另一方面则可能陷入基层治理的“指标陷阱”,围绕指标任务进行过度动员,产生指标治理的悬浮性困境,难以有效回应基层治理实际需求。因此,应充分考虑基层社会的治理情境,保持指标动员的弹性,因地制宜地推行指标简约治理,科学设置指标体系,发挥基层工作人员的主动性,弱化指标考核结果的刚性化导向,防范指标形式主义。

关键词: 治理, 指标, 基层治理, 指标动员, 指标治理, 指标考核, 行政激励

Abstract: The state is committed to curbing formalism and reducing burdens in primary-level governance.Indicator mobilization provides a critical analytical lens forunderstanding burden alleviation,empowerment,and cadre motivation at the primary level.Indicators carry inherent governance functions,acting not only as governance instruments and tasks but also as performance metrics.Following the operational logic of indicators,indicator mobilization drives task allocation,responsibility refinement,key task implementation,and goal fulfillment through indicator design,decomposition,implementation,and assessment.Based on assessment outcomes,administrative incentives and constraints are established to regulate personnel mobility and position adjustment,thereby improving the efficiency and quality of primary-level governance.As a key organizational mechanism,indicator mobilization integrates "tiao-kuai" (vertical and horizontal) resources and motivates primary-level staff.Nevertheless,it may risk falling into the "indicator trap",triggering excessive task-driven mobilization and governance suspension,thus failing to effectively respond to real governance demands.Therefore,governance contexts must be fully considered to maintain flexibility in indicator mobilization.Indicator-based minimalist governance should be promoted locally with scientifically designed systems.The initiative of primary-level staff should be enhanced,rigid assessment orientations weakened,and indicator formalism prevented.

Key words: governance, indicator, primary-level governance, indicator mobilization, indicator-based governance, indicator assessment, administrative incentive

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ