吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 103-112.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.06.009

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

抵制与反制:反外国制裁法境外实体的法律适用——以“新疆棉事件”的法治破局为例

刘俊梅   

  1. (1.伊犁师范大学 法学院,新疆 伊宁 835000;2.伊犁师范大学 “一带一路”发展研究院,新疆 伊宁 835000))
  • 出版日期:2023-11-01 发布日期:2023-11-28
  • 作者简介:刘俊梅,女,博士,伊犁师范大学法学院讲师,伊犁师范大学“一带一路”发展研究院兼职研究员。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(22GJB00212)

Fighting back the Boycott:The Legal Application of the Law against Foreign Sanctions to Overseas Entities—Taking the Legal Breakthrough of the "Xinjiang Cotton Incident" as an Example

LIU Junmei   

  1. (1.Law School,Yili Normal University,Yining 835000,Xinjiang China;2.Research Institute of "The Belt and Road" Development,Yili Normal University,Yining 835000,Xinjiang China)
  • Online:2023-11-01 Published:2023-11-28

摘要:作为境外实体,瑞士良好棉花发展协会(Better Cotton Initiative,BCI)对良好棉花的认证程序与认证标准包含诸多主观因素,所谓“调查工作组”的人员构成足以证明其关于“新疆棉”的结论具有明显的政治干预色彩。BCI对“新疆棉”的抵制行为已构成歧视性限制措施,旨在补充美国对华制裁广度和深度,是一种特殊形式的对华“贸易战”。BCI属于国际非政府组织,不具备国际法主体资格,从而游离于国际法规则的管制之外。但其抵制行为已构成对《反外国制裁法》第4条和第15条的违反,从而适用于该法规范的外国行为予以调整。相关部门可依据该法及相关法律,将BCI列入反制清单、不可靠实体清单,并采取相应的法律制裁。我国受损企业或个人亦可依法向人民法院提起诉讼,请求停止侵害并赔偿损失。

关键词: 贸易战, 反制裁, 反外国制裁法, “新疆棉事件”, 国际非政府组织

Abstract: As an overseas entity,the Swiss Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) contains many subjective factors in its certification procedures and standards for good cotton,and the composition of the so-called "investigation working group" is sufficient to prove that its conclusion on "Xinjiang cotton" has obvious political interference.BCI's boycott of "Xinjiang cotton" has constituted a discriminatory restriction measure,which aims to supplement US sanctions against China,and so it essentially is a special form of "trade war" against China.BCI is an international non-governmental organization and does not have the qualification of the subject of international law,so it dissociates from the control of the rules of international law.However,its boycott has constituted a violation of articles 4 and 15 of the Law against Foreign Sanctions,which is applicable to foreign acts regulated by the law.Based on this,the relevant departments may include BCI in the counter-list and the list of unreliable entities in accordance with the law and relevant laws,and take corresponding legal sanctions.The damaged enterprises or individuals in China can also bring a lawsuit to the people's court in accordance with the law,requesting to stop the infringement and compensate for the losses.

Key words: trade war, anti-sanctions, Law against Foreign Sanctions, Xinjiang Cotton incident, international non-governmental organizations

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ