吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 16-20.
• 伦理学研究 • 上一篇 下一篇
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Online:
Published:
摘要:康德为解决理性运用中的统一问题,依据逻辑确定实践理性具有优先地位;牟宗三则依据中国传统资源认为德行优先于知识。对两者进行比较发现,道德优先是康德和牟宗三各自建立道德形而上学的必要前提;因而道德优先论之花开出的结果必然是有待实践证实的道德理想主义。
关键词: 道德优先, 牟宗三, 康德, 道德形而上学
Abstract: To solve the unity problem in rational utilization,Kant puts practical rationality in a prior position according to logic,while Mou Zongsan regards that morality is prior to knowledge according to traditional Chinese source.Comparing the two,we may find that moral priority is the precondition for Kant and Mou Zongsan to propose moral metaphysics respectively,and it will certainly lead to moral idealism to be tested by practice.
Key words: moral priority, Mou Zongsan, Kant, moral metaphysics
陈伟. 道德优先论:康德与牟宗三比较[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2009, 30(5): 16-20.
CHEN Wei. A Comparison between Kant and Mou Zongsan on Moral Priority[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences), 2009, 30(5): 16-20.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/CN/
https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2009/V30/I5/16