吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2004, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (2): 105-111.

• 历史学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

乾隆朝黄梅案中民意的体现及其意义

  

  1. (厦门大学 历史系,福建 厦门 361005)
  • 出版日期:2004-04-15 发布日期:2012-08-15
  • 作者简介:王日根(1964-),男,江苏兴化人,历史学博士,厦门大学历史系教授、博士生导师。

On the Embudiment of the Will of the People in the Handle of Huang Mei Case in the Reign of Qianlong of the Tang Dynasty

  1. (History Department of Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China)
  • Online:2004-04-15 Published:2012-08-15

摘要:乾隆朝官员贪污现象严重,乾隆惩治贪污的决心和举措也大而多。但即使是像浙江平阳知县黄梅的一桩勒派入己案这样并不复杂的案件,也经历了颇为曲折的历程。户部尚书曹文埴与浙江学政窦光鼐在查办此案中发生意见分歧,彼此争相利用民意作为政治资源,塑造出民意的不同版本,真实的民意表达又不能顺畅上达,导致该案的审理屡经变易。案件虽然最后得到审结,但漫长的过程本身却提供了贪污得以存在的土壤,乾隆朝贪污惩治机制所发挥的效果十分有限。

关键词: 乾隆朝, 黄梅案, 民意, 塑造

Abstract: In the reign of Emperor Qianlong,corruption was the order of the day,and severe measures were adopted to punish corrupted officials.The case of Huang Mei(who was magistrate of Pingyang County,Zhejiang Province) was not so complicated but underwent complexed processes.While handling this case,Cao Wenzhi,Minister of the Board of Revenue,and Dou Guangnai,Educational Administrator of Zhejiang Province,vied with each other in making advantage of public opinion to add to their political weight,and molded varied copies of popular will.The case was finally closed,but the complexed process itself showed that there existed proper soil for the spread of corruption and that the function of corruption-punishing mechanism of Emperor Qianlong was rather limited.

Key words: The reign of Emperor Qianlong, Huang Mei Case, public opinion, mold

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ