吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2013.04.001

• 特稿 •    下一篇

宣扬自我责任:全球治理的中国风格

  

  1. (1.台湾大学 政治学系,台北 10617;2.华东师范大学 政治学系,上海 200241;3.上海交通大学 国际与公共事务学院,上海 200030)
  • 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-18
  • 作者简介:石之瑜,男,博士,台湾大学政治学系教授。黄琼致,男,台湾大学政治学系博士后研究人员。李巧丽,女,华东师范大学政治学系硕士生。杨志军,男,上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:

    2012年度教育部“博士研究生学术新人奖”资助项目

Preaching Self-Responsibility:The Chinese Style of Global Governance

  1. (1.Department of Political Science,Taiwan University,Taipei 10617,Taiwan;2.Department of Political Science,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China;3.School of International and Public Affairs,Shanghai Jiaotong University,Shanghai 200030,China)
  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-18

摘要:目前的西方研究大都关注特定文化和政治背景下的中国如何看待全球治理问题。这些内容包括:(1)儒家思想中的不干预和自我治理倾向;(2)社会主义中的集体主义道德观强调用说服而不是单边主义来解决世界冲突;(3)源于不发达而产生的劣势损害了自信;(4)二战以来联合国和美国控制主要国际组织的行径令人反感。由此认为,全球治理格局中的中国风格是被动回应的而不是积极主动的,是问题解决导向而不是目标驱动型,全球义务与改革任务更多地聚集于主要大国而不是处于衰退中的国家。也就是说,中国目前仍然主张通过依靠世界主要国家的自主治理模式来树立全球领导力,那种仅仅依靠闭门式的说服行动和反对公开制裁的例证来干预失败或衰退国家的做法是行不通的。

关键词: 全球治理, 自我责任, 中国风格

Abstract: The present study traces the cultural and political contexts within which Beijing considers global governance.They include:(1) Confucian dispositions toward non-interventionism and self-governance;(2) the socialist collectivist ethics that stress persuasion instead of unilateralism;(3) a lingering sense of inferiority arising from underdevelopment that harms self-confidence;and (4) the repugnant experiences with the United Nations (UN) and the United States that have dominated most international organizations since World War II.The consequential Chinese style of global governance is reactive rather than proactive,problemsolving rather than goal-driven,and attentive to obligation and reform more in other major countries than in failing states.That said,China could still assert global leadership by acting as a model of self-governance for other major countries and by intervening in failing states only through closed-door persuasion and exemplification as opposed to open sanctioning.

Key words: global governance, self-responsibility, chinese style

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ