吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 101-111.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.05.010

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

《监察法》修改背景下先行拘留制度的存续逻辑与谦抑适用

马静华,余长江   

  1. (1.四川大学 法学院,四川 成都 610207;2.山东政法学院 刑事司法学院,山东 济南 250014)
  • 出版日期:2026-09-01 发布日期:2026-09-22
  • 作者简介:马静华,男,博士,四川大学法学院教授,博士生导师;
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金西部项目(22XFX014)

The Logic of Continuation and the Restrained Application of Prior Detention Against the Backdrop of the Amendment to Supervision Law

Ma Jinghua,Yu Changjiang   

  1. (1.School of Law,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610207,China;2.School of Criminal Justice,Shandong University of Political Science and Law,Jinan 250014,China)
  • Online:2026-09-01 Published:2026-09-22

摘要:先行拘留是监检衔接制度的重要组成元素,其在功能上呈现出二元对立的特点。一方面,作为监察程序和刑事程序衔接措施的先行拘留,为程序转换提供了充足的审查时间,考虑到了办案过程中的实际需求,具有较强的实用主义功能。另一方面,作为羁押衔接措施的先行拘留,其适用时未考虑到不同羁押措施的条件差异以及被追诉人社会危险性的变化;监察留置与逮捕措施之间的“等价性”,会随着诉讼程序的推进逐步弱化。考虑到先行拘留实用功能的不可替代性及其改善被追诉人处境之价值,先行拘留仍有保留的必要。先行拘留作为监检衔接的过渡性措施,并非完美的制度设计,而是多种实践模式择优保留的结果。修正后的《中华人民共和国监察法》确立了梯度性的监察强制措施体系,但未规定不同强制措施之间的转化机制。先行拘留适用中的谦抑性尚未确立,不符合比例原则的基本要求。基于相对合理主义的立场,为贯彻比例原则,应当注重监察留置必要性审查机制的构建,通过缩减监察案件后期留置的被调查人比例,间接控制先行拘留的过度适用。

关键词: 《监察法》, 监检衔接, 强制措施, 先行拘留, 羁押, 留置, 检察机关

Abstract:

Prior detention constitutes an important component of coordination mechanisms between supervisory and procuratorial organs and exhibits functional dual-opposition. On one hand, as a connecting measure between supervision and criminal procedures, prior detention guarantees sufficient review time for procedural conversion and accommodates practical case-handling needs, thus serving strong pragmatic functions. On the other hand, as a custodial-detention-related linkage measure, its application fails to account for differing conditions among custodial measures and changing personal social dangerousness. Equivalence between supervision-case detention and arrest gradually weakens as litigation procedures advance. Given the irreplaceable pragmatic value of prior detention and the necessity to improve procedural standing for prosecuted persons, retaining prior detention remains reasonable. As a transitional coordination instrument between supervisory and procuratorial organs, prior detention represents a best-available practical choice rather than a perfect institutional design. The amended Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China establishes a hierarchical system of supervisory compulsory measures yet fails to stipulate conversion mechanisms among different compulsory-measure categories. A principle of restraint governing prior-detention application is still absent, which contradicts basic proportionality-principle requirements. From a relative-rationalism perspective and to implement proportionality, mechanisms for reviewing detention necessity within supervision cases should be constructed, and excessive prior-detention application shall be indirectly controlled by lowering detention ratios in later-stage supervision procedures.


Key words: Supervision Law, connection between supervision and inspection, compulsory measures, pre detention, take into custody, detention, procuratorial organ

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ