吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 155-165.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2025.02.016

• 新时代 新青年 新学术:博士生论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

政策细化能消解政策模糊吗?——基于中间层政府行动偏差的反思

杜其君   

  1. (中南财经政法大学 公共管理学院,湖北 武汉 430073)
  • 出版日期:2025-03-01 发布日期:2025-05-20
  • 作者简介:杜其君,男,中南财经政法大学公共管理学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(20YJA810003)

Can Policy Refinement Eliminate Policy Ambiguity? — Reflections Based on the Action Deviation of the Intermediate Layer 

DU Qijun   

  1. (School of Public Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430073,China)
  • Online:2025-03-01 Published:2025-05-20

摘要:在应然层面,政策细化能够消解政策模糊,中间层政府通过嵌入地方情境,分解政策任务,从而实现政策目标的逐层清晰、政策工具的逐层适配、技术标准的逐层精细、考核要求的逐层明确。但是,在复杂情境中,政策模糊为中间层政府预留了自主性的行动空间,中间层政府在政策细化时便可能偏离应然轨道,造成细化的偏差,表现为因细化不足而导致的模糊延续和因细化过载而造成的层层加码。政策细化偏差的形成具有四重机制:多任务情境中的边界超越、权责错位情境中的责任转移、不确定性情境中的风险规避、地方竞争情境中的绩效竞逐,致使中间层政府在政策细化中选择不同的方式,最后导致政策细化难以实现应然功能。模糊延续和层层加码虽然有利于增强中间层政府应对不确定性风险的灵活度,防止科层执行力的衰减,但也存在阻滞政策行动和加重基层负担的负效应。对此,需要促进任务与资源的平衡协调,根据政策权力建立和完善责任清单,增强中间层政府应对不确定性风险的能力,完善政策细化的绩效考核方式。对政策细化消解政策模糊功能的分析,证明了政策细化与政策清晰之间并非线性关系,这有利于更加理性、全面地把握政策细化的角色定位。

关键词: 政策细化, 政策模糊, 模糊延续, 层层加码, 政策执行

Abstract: In theory,policy refinement is expected to eliminate policy ambiguity.Local governments can progressively achieve clearer policy objectives,better-adapted policy instruments,finer technical standards,and more explicit evaluation criteria by embedding policies into local contexts and detailing tasks layer by layer.However,within complex context,policy ambiguity provides intermediate layer governments with a degree of autonomy,potentially causing them to deviate from the intended path during policy refinement.This deviation is manifested either as the continuation of ambiguity due to insufficient refinement or the imposition of additional burdens due to over-refinement.The formation of such deviations in policy refinement involves four mechanisms: boundary crossing in multi-task scenarios,responsibility shifting in mismatched authority and accountability situations,risk aversion in uncertain conditions,and performance competition in local competitive environments.These factors cause intermediate layer governments to adopt different approaches during policy refinement,ultimately resulting in deviations.While the continuation of ambiguity and the imposition of additional layers can enhance the flexibility of intermediate layer governments in handling uncertainties and prevent bureaucratic execution power decay,they also have negative effects,such as impeding policy actions and increasing primary-level burdens.To address these issues,it is necessary to promote balanced coordination between tasks and resources,establish and improve responsibility lists based on policy powers,enhance the capacity of intermediate layer governments to manage uncertainty risks,and refine the performance evaluation methods.The analysis of the function of policy refinement in mitigating policy ambiguity demonstrates that the relationship between policy refinement and policy clarity is not linear.This finding contributes to a more rational and comprehensive understanding of the role and positioning of policy refinement.

Key words: policy refinement, policy ambiguity, continuation of ambiguity, layer-by- layer pressure, policy implementation

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ