吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 116-124.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2022.02.013

• 三农问题 • 上一篇    下一篇

基层政府农业政策执行悖论与应对之策——基于“模糊-冲突”模型的分析

黄建红   

  1. (湖南农业大学 公共管理与法学学院,湖南 长沙410128)
  • 出版日期:2022-03-01 发布日期:2022-04-12
  • 作者简介:黄建红,女,博士,湖南农业大学公共管理与法学学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(17BZZ050);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(18YBA231)

Paradoxes of Agricultural Policy Implementation by Grassroots Governments and Countermeasures:Based on the Analysis of the "Ambiguity-Conflict" Model

HUANG Jianhong   

  1. (College of Public Administration and Law,Hunan Agricultural University,Changsha 410128,China)
  • Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-04-12

摘要:乡村振兴战略全面实施,各项农业政策在农村落地开花。然而政策文本制度与现实执行层面存在巨大反差,出现了冷热两重天的政策执行悖论:一方面是基层政府各项农业政策执行得热火朝天,另一方面是农民等基层政策参与者对农业政策执行的冷静观望甚至漠不关心。以理查德·马特兰德的模糊-冲突模型为分析框架,分析W县Q镇农业政策执行过程,探讨科层制结构下的行政性执行、政治锦标赛下的政治性执行、积极惯性下的实验性执行、亚瘫痪状态下的象征性执行,发现:在模糊性较低的自上而下执行路径中,基层政府面对层级压力和政绩考核,一般通过树立样板的典型性执行和扶植精英的替代性执行来完成政策目标;而在模糊性较高的自下而上执行路径中,基层政策目标群体因为参与感和主动权的缺失,最终通过各种形式主义来消极应付性执行和机械象征性执行。此研究进一步解释了农业政策执行悖论产生的根源,并在此基础上提出资源整合、利益均衡、农民参与、多元联动等提升基层政府农业政策执行效果的路径。

关键词: 基层政府, 农业政策, 执行悖论, 模糊-冲突模型

Abstract: When the rural revitalization strategy is fully implemented,various agricultural policies have been implemented in rural areas.However,there is a huge contrast between the policy text system and the actual implementation level,resulting in a paradox of policy implementation.On the one hand,the implementation of various agricultural policies by the grass-roots government is in full swing;on the other hand,farmers and other grass-roots policy participants are calm and even indifferent to the implementation of agricultural policies.Based on the analysis of the "Ambiguity -Conflict" model as the analytical framework,this paper analyzes the process of agricultural policy implementation in Q Town,W County,and discusses the administrative implementation under the hierarchical structure,the political implementation under the political tournament,the experimental implementation under positive inertia and the symbolic implementation under sub-paralysis.It is found that in the top-down implementation path with low fuzziness,the grass-roots government generally completes the policy objectives by establishing a model of typical implementation and fostering elites' alternative implementation because of hierarchical pressure and performance evaluation;while in the highly fuzzy bottom-up implementation path,the grass-roots policy target groups finally deal with negative implementation and mechanical symbolic implementation through various formalism because of the lack of sense of participation and initiative.The paper further explains the root of the paradox of agricultural policy implementation,and on this basis,puts forward the ways to improve grass-roots government agricultural policy implementation,such as resource integration,balance of interests,farmers' participation,pluralistic linkage and so on.

Key words: implementation paradox, grassroots government, agricultural policy, ambiguity-conflict model

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ