吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 34-42.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2021.01.005

• “生物安全的法治保障”专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

论生物安全法律规制的范式转变——从损害管理到风险治理

鲁冰清   

  1. (甘肃政法大学 环境法学院,甘肃 兰州 730070)
  • 出版日期:2021-01-01 发布日期:2021-02-03
  • 作者简介:鲁冰清,女,博士,甘肃政法大学环境法学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省哲学社会科学规划项目(YB085);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(20YJC820032);国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD174)

On the Paradigm Shift of Legal Regulation of Biosecurity:From Damage Management to Risk Governance

LU Bingqing   

  1. (College of Environmental Law,Gansu University of Political Science and Law,Lanzhou 730070,China)
  • Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-02-03

摘要:当前我国以损害管理为主的生物安全法律规制范式尚未全面、系统地贯彻风险预防理念,条块分割的管理体制导致主管部门与地方政府以及部门之间存在信息壁垒,缺乏协调与合作,且生物安全规制机制仍体现出浓重的行政规制色彩,生物安全风险预防制度体系也出现严重缺失,无法适应风险社会中保障生物安全的迫切需要。生态风险的客观性与不确定性,以及从环境管理向环境治理转型的实践需求则为生物安全法律规制范式从损害管理向风险治理的转变奠定了正当性基础。在具体进路上,生物安全法律规制范式从损害管理到风险治理的转变应当从风险预防原则的引领、生物安全风险合作治理、生物安全风险治理的制度建设等方面展开。

关键词: 生物安全, 损害管理, 风险治理

Abstract: Presently,the concept of risk prevention,which is mainly based on damage management,is not comprehensively implemented in the legal regulation paradigm of biosecurity in our country.The fragmented management system has led to information barriers,lack of coordination and cooperation between local governments and departments,and the strong administrative regulation and the deficiency of biosecurity risk prevention system have also failed to ensure biosecurity in the risk society.The objectivity and uncertainty of ecological risk and the practical needs of the shift from environmental management to environmental governance have laid a legitimate foundation for the paradigm change of biosecurity legal regulation from damage management to risk governance.On the specific way,this shift should be carried out from the guidance of risk prevention principle,biosecurity risk cooperative governance,and institutional construction of biosafety risk governance,and so on.

Key words: biosecurity, damage management, risk management

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ