底层弱者的“武器”：个体表演、例外话语和身体暴力

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.06.011

吉首大学学报（社会科学版）

底层弱者的“武器”：个体表演、例外话语和身体暴力

林仲轩

（中山大学传播与设计学院，广东广州 510006）

出版日期:2018-11-01 发布日期:2018-10-16
作者简介:林仲轩，男，博士，中山大学传播与设计学院副研究员。
基金资助:
教育部哲学社科研究重大课题攻关项目（16JZD006）

Weapons of Subaltern Weak:Individual Performance,Exception Discourse and Body Violence

LIN Zhongxuan

(School of Communication and Design,Sun Yat-sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China）

Online:2018-11-01 Published:2018-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要：相较印度及东南亚，中国底层政治有其在地化特色，即主要依赖个体表演、例外话语和身体暴力作为弱者的“武器”：采用个体表演的公开极化形式而非社群的集体抗争或者个体的隐藏文本；例外话语用来指认逍遥法外的他者而不非寻求对自我的法外开恩；身体暴力是弱者暴力和自我暴力而非强者暴力和他者暴力。

关键词： 底层研究, 弱者武器, 表演, 例外, 暴力

Abstract: Compared with the subaltern politics in India and Southeast Asia,Chinese subaltern contentious politics has its own localized characteristics,relying on weapons of individual performance,exception discourse,and body violence.Firstly,it is the individual performance that becomes the polarization of individual contention in Chinese subaltern politics,rather than the collective contention of communities or the hidden transcripts of individuals.Secondly,the discourse of exception is not used to ask for temperance and mercy on the subaltern themselves,but strategically appropriated by subaltern people to identify their antagonistic others.Thirdly,the violence in Chinese subaltern politics is mostly the violence of the weak,rather than the violence of the powerful,and the violence on the self,rather than the violence on the others.

Key words: subaltern studies, weapons of the weak, performance, exception, violence

林仲轩. 底层弱者的“武器”：个体表演、例外话语和身体暴力[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.06.011.

LIN Zhongxuan. Weapons of Subaltern Weak:Individual Performance,Exception Discourse and Body Violence[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2018.06.011.

参考文献

[1] 古哈.论殖民地印度史编纂的若干问题[M]//刘健芝,许兆麟.庶民研究.北京:中央编译出版社,2005. [2] 徐小涵.两种“反抗史”的书写——斯科特与底层研究学派的对比评述[J].社会学研究,2010(1). [3] Chatterjee,P.The politics of the governed:Reflections on popular politics in most of the world [M].New York:Columbia University Press,2004. [4] 钱永祥.质疑政治社会的东方属性[M]//陈光兴.发现政治社会——现代性、国家暴力与后殖民民主.台北:巨流图书公司,2000. [5] Chen,K.H.Civil society and min-jian:On political society and popular democracy [J].Cultural Studies,2003(6). [6] Chatterjee,P.Lineages of political society:Studies in postcolonial democracy [M].New York:Columbia University Press,2011. [7] Chatterjee,P.Community in the east [J].Economic and Political Weekly,1998(6). [8] 孙立平.我们面对一个断裂的社会[J].战略与管理,2007(2). [9] 李强.从“整体型社会聚合体”到“碎片化”的利益群体[J].新视野,2008(5). [10] 黄振辉.表演式抗争:景观、挑战与发生机理——基于珠江三角洲典型案例研究[J].开放时代,2011(2). [11] Young,J.The exclusive society:Social exclusion,crime and difference in late modernity[M].London:Sage,1999.宁应斌.排斥的公民社会：公民治理与“文化战争”[M]//谭若梅,古学斌,江绍祺.公民身分的再思与打造:华人社会的社会排斥与边缘性.香港:香港理工大学应用社会科学系政策研究中心,2005. [12] Chatterjee,P.Democracy and the violence of the state:A political negotiation of death[J].Inter-Asia Cultural Studies,2001(1). [13] O'Brien,K.J.& Li,L.Rightful resistance in rural China [M].New York and Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2005.于建嵘.当前农民维权活动的一个解释框架[J].社会学研究,2004(2). [14] 张书军,单媛.以舆抗争:农民维权方式的新变化[J].阅江学刊,2013(4). [15] Agamben,G.Homo sacer:Sovereign power and bare life[M].Stanford,Calif.:Stanford University Press,1998. [16] Mouffe,C.The return of the political[M].London:Verso,1993. [17] 帕沙·查特吉,陈光兴.知识与政治的承诺——专访Partha Chatterjee[M]//陈光兴，帕沙·查特吉.发现政治社会：现代性、国家暴力与后殖民民主.台北:巨流图书公司,2000. [18] 董海军.“作为武器的弱者身份”:农民维权抗争的底层政治[J].社会,2008(4). [19] Spivak,G.C.Can the Subaltern Speak?[M]//C.Nelson and L.Grossberg,eds.Marxism and the interpretation of culture.Urbana,IL.:University of Illinois Press,1988. [20] 刘建明.社会舆论原理[M].北京:华夏出版社,2002. [21] Foucault,M.Discipline and punish:The birth of the prison[M].London:Penguin,1977. [22] Thompson,J.The media and modernity:A social theory of the media[M].CA:Stanford University Press,1995. [23] Benford,R.D.& Hunt,S.A.Dramaturgy and social movements:The social construction and communication of power[J].Sociological Inquiry,1992(1). [24] Deegan,M.J.“Dear Love,Dear Love” feminist pragmatism and the Chicago female world of love and ritual[J].Gender and Society,1996(10).Taylor,V.& Rupp,L.J.Loving internationalism:The emotion culture of transnational women's organizations,1888—1945[J].Mobilization:An International Journal,2002(2). [25] Juris,J.S.Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere:Social media,public space,and emerging logics of aggregation[J].American Ethnologist,2012(2). [26] DeLuca,K.M.Image politics:The new rhetoric of environmental activism[M].NY:Guilford Press,1999. [27] 吕德文.媒介动员、钉子户与抗争政治:宜黄事件再分析[J].社会,2012(2). [28] Duara,P.Rescuing history from the nation:Questioning narratives of modern China[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1995. [29] iek,S.Against the populist temptation[J].Critical Inquiry,2006(3). [30] 杨国斌.悲情与戏谑:网络事件中的情感动员[J].传播与社会学刊,2009(9). [31] Rancière,J.The emancipated spectator[M].London:Verso,2011. [32] Green,J.W.The eyes of the people:Democracy in an age of spectatorship[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2009.

底层弱者的“武器”：个体表演、例外话语和身体暴力

Weapons of Subaltern Weak:Individual Performance,Exception Discourse and Body Violence

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	盛明科, 杨玉兰. 微博时代公共舆论暴力的产生及其治理机制研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2013, 34(3): 73-78.
[2]	李培超. 《反杜林论》的伦理思想探析[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2010, 31(6): 1-9.
[3]	邓姿. 论七月派小说的癫狂叙事[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2010, 31(3): 101-105.