吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 167-176.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.02.017

• 新时代 新青年 新学术:博士生论坛 • 上一篇    

多元一体格局的地方性实践:海南哥隆人的文化接触与族性建构

方玲   

  1. (1.陕西师范大学 音乐学院,陕西 西安 710119;2.海南师范大学 团委,海南 海口 571158)

  • 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-02-07
  • 作者简介:方玲,女,陕西师范大学音乐学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    海南省哲学社会科学规划课题(HNSK(JD)21-21);海南省高等学校教育教学改革研究项目(Hnjg2023ZD-20,Hnjg2025ZD-25)

The Local Realization of the Pattern of Unity in Diversity:Cultural Contact and Ethnicity Construction among the Gelong People in Hainan

FANG Ling   

  1. (1.College of Music,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710119,China;2.Committee of the Communist Youth League,Hainan Normal University,Haikou 571158,China)

  • Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-02-07

摘要:海南哥隆人是聚居在海南岛昌化江下游的黎汉共同体,其在民族识别中被归为汉族,却使用属壮侗语族黎语支的“村话”。这一身份与文化的二元张力凸显了其族群的建构性本质。哥隆人族群是宋元以来在海南岛这一“文化接触”地带中,通过“军屯”“土著”通婚、文化融合与国家治理三者历时性互动的产物。具体而言,哥隆语词汇呈现“黎语底层”和“汉语上层”的有序结构,亲属称谓中父系汉语化与母系黎语存留,印证了历史通婚机制;婚姻仪式创造性融合汉族命理与黎族物候占验,形成“人算”和“天验”的双轨合法化机制;社会制度上,“女儿坊”在黎族“隆闺”基础上融入汉族伦理规训,成为调适社交自由与礼教规范的文化场域。哥隆人族性的生成,依赖于内部基于语言与礼俗的文化整合,以及“对上言汉”与“对下言黎”的情境化身份策略,最终在现代民族识别中被制度性定格为汉族。此案例深刻揭示了族群本质的动态社会建构过程,为阐释通过文化融合与制度调适实现中华民族多元一体格局的地方性实践机制提供了理论启示与案例实证。

关键词: 文化接触, 哥隆人, 文化融合, 族性建构, 多元一体

Abstract: The Gelong people are a Li-Han hybrid community residing in the lower reaches of the Changhua River on Hainan Island.Officially classified as Han Chinese in China's ethnic identification system,they speak Cunhua (commonly referred to as "Village Language"),a language belonging to the Li branch of the Tai-Kadai family.This disjunction between official identity and linguistic-cultural practice underscores the socially constructed nature of their ethnicity.The Gelong emerged historically—from the Song and Yuan dynasties onward—as a product of Hainan Island's role as a "cultural contact zone", shaped by the triadic interplay of intermarriage between Han military colonists (juntun) and indigenous Li groups,sustained cultural fusion,and evolving state governance.Linguistically,Cunhua exhibits a stratified structure:a Li substratum overlaid with a Chinese superstratum.Kinship terminology further reflects this hybridity—patrilineal terms are sinicized,while matrilineal terms retain Li forms—corroborating historical patterns of asymmetric intermarriage.Marriage rituals creatively synthesize Han numerological divination (ren suan,"human calculation") and Li phenological omens (tian yan,"heavenly verification"),establishing a dual-track legitimization mechanism.Socially,the Nü'erfang ("Daughters' House",a cultural arena mediating between social freedom and ritual norms) evolved from the Li longgui ("communal youth dormitory") by incorporating Han ethical norms,thereby functioning as a cultural arena that mediates between indigenous social freedom and Confucian ritual discipline.Gelong ethnicity was thus forged through internal cultural integration and pragmatic identity strategies—presenting as Han in interactions with state authorities while maintaining Li affiliations in local contexts—culminating in their institutional classification as Han during modern ethnic identification.This case vividly illustrates the dynamic,processual nature of ethnic formation and provides both theoretical insight and empirical grounding for understanding how the Chinese nation's "unity in diversity" is locally realized through cultural negotiation and institutional adaptation.

Key words:

Gelong people, cultural fusion, ethnicity construction, unity in diversity

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ