吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 106-115.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.02.012

• 哲学 • 上一篇    下一篇

效用的幽灵与算法的铁笼:技术功利主义伦理的三重悖论

杨桦   

  1. (北京工业大学 马克思主义学院,北京 100124)

  • 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-02-06
  • 作者简介:杨桦,男,博士,北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心特约研究员,北京工业大学马克思主义学院讲师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CZX044);北京市习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心北京工业大学研究基地课题(24XJDY006)

The Specter of Utility and the Iron Cage of Algorithm:Three Ethical Paradoxes of Technological Utilitarianism

YANG Hua   

  1. (School of Marxism,Beijing University of Technology,Beijing 100124,China)

  • Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-02-06

摘要:算法基于其数字还原和结果导向的技术特征,在资本逻辑的推动下与功利主义“效用最大化”价值紧密结合,构筑了一个以技术功利主义为内核的算法“铁笼”。这一耦合在现实运作中内生性地激化了三重伦理悖论,并由此构成对技术功利主义自身价值承诺的颠覆。以解构繁琐劳动试图解放人类的同时,亦破坏性地异化了人类价值、人类生活和人类理性;以可靠流程试图破除人类道德慎思中的不确定性之际,却同步消解了责任归属的聚焦式主体;以规训式权力提升人类整体福利水平的过程,反而不断再生产出结构性的社会不公。这些悖论不仅暴露了技术功利主义伦理框架的内在张力,而且更凸显其效用至上原则与人的全面发展之间的深刻矛盾。面对算法技术在当今社会的普遍运用和广泛影响,应该从根本上审视并重构其底层伦理逻辑,以多元化伦理原则补充技术功利主义立场,方能真正打破算法的铁笼。

关键词: 效用, 算法, 技术功利主义, 伦理悖论

Abstract:

Algorithms,characterized by digital reductionism and result-oriented technicality,have converged with the utilitarian imperative of "maximizing utility" under the impetus of capital logic,forging an algorithmic "iron cage" rooted in technological utilitarianism.This synergy inherently intensifies three ethical paradoxes in practice,thereby subverting the core value commitments of technological utilitarianism itself.First,while purporting to liberate humanity from tedious labor,it corrosively alienates human values,human life,and human rationality.Second,while seeking to eliminate uncertainties inherent in human moral deliberation through ostensibly reliable processes,it concurrently erodes the very locus of moral accountability.Third,in employing disciplinary power to ostensibly elevate collective welfare,it instead perpetuates structural social injustice.These paradoxes not only expose the internal tensions within the ethical framework of technological utilitarianism but also highlight the fundamental contradiction between its utility-first principle and the comprehensive development of human beings.Given the pervasive application and profound influence of algorithmic technology in contemporary society,it is imperative to fundamentally scrutinize and reconstruct its underlying ethical logic.Only by supplementing the technological-utilitarian stance with pluralistic ethical principles can the algorithmic iron cage be truly dismantled.

Key words:

utility, algorithms, technological utilitarianism, ethical paradoxes

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ