吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 68-76.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2026.02.008

• “认罪认罚”专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

认罪认罚自愿性保障的实践反思和完善思路

樊崇义,胡志风   

  1. (1.中国政法大学 国家法律援助研究院,北京 100088;2.北京职业政法学院 应用法律学院,北京 102628)

  • 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-02-06
  • 作者简介:樊崇义,男,中国政法大学国家法律援助研究院教授,博士生导师;胡志风,女,博士,北京职业政法学院应用法律学院教授。
  • 基金资助:
    研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA032)

The Key Subject of Legislative Amendment of the System of Leniency on Admission of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment

FAN Chongyi,HU Zhifeng   

  1. (1.College of National Legal Aid,China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China;2.School of Applied Law,Beijing College of Politics and Law,Beijing 102628,China)

  • Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-02-06

摘要:实践中值班律师因会见权、辩护权、阅卷权行使不充分和效果难评价等,难以为被追诉人提供实质帮助。被追诉人的协商参与权与知情权无法保障,各主体之间的量刑协商存在机制弊端,致使协商不足,进一步导致认罪认罚自愿性保障存在难题。为完善认罪认罚的自愿性保障机制,有必要在第四次《刑事诉讼法》修改之际规定相应的制度或者措施加以应对。首先应严格贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策和以审判为中心的理念,促进司法现代化,然后将值班律师法律帮助的案件范围与职能法定化,通过立法全面保障被追诉人的知情权和参与权。同时,需整体改进量刑建议协商制度,坚持公检法三机关分工负责、相互配合、互相制约的原则,并明确人民法院采纳量刑建议的相对自主性。

关键词: 认罪认罚, 自愿性, 保障机制, 《刑事诉讼法》, 被追诉人, 律师

Abstract: In practice,it is difficult for duty lawyers to provide substantive help to the accused because of the inadequate exercise of the right to meet,the right to defend,the right to review papers and the difficulty in evaluating the effect. The right to participate in the negotiation and the right to know cannot be guaranteed,and the mechanism of sentencing negotiation among various subjects leads to insufficient negotiation,which further leads to the problem of voluntary protection of guilty plea. In order to improve the voluntary guarantee mechanism of guilty plea,it is necessary to provide corresponding systems or measures to cope with the fourth revision of the "Criminal Procedure Law". We should strictly implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity and the trial-centered concept,promote judicial modernization,and then legalize the scope and functions of duty lawyers' legal help,and comprehensively protect the accused's right to know and right to participate through legislation. At the same time,it is necessary to improve the consultation system of sentencing proposals as a whole,adhere to the principle of division of responsibilities,mutual cooperation and mutual restriction among the three organs of the "Public Security Law",and clarify the relative autonomy of people’s courts in adopting sentencing proposals.

Key words:

guilty plea, voluntariness, safeguards, Criminal Procedure Law, the accused person, lawyer

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ