吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 50-59.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2025.05.006

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国少年法庭受案范围拓展的理论逻辑与实践展开

吴鹏飞,姚润智   

  1. (上海海事大学 法学院,上海 201306)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-11-03
  • 作者简介:吴鹏飞,男,博士,上海海事大学法学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目(22BFX060)

Theoretical Logic and Practical Development of Expanding the Case Acceptance Scope of China's Juvenile Courts

WU Pengfei,YAO Runzhi   

  1. (Law School,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China)
  • Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-03

摘要:受案范围是少年审判制度的基础性范畴,关涉未成年人权益保护司法介入的限度,直接影响司法对未成年人权益进行保护的广度与深度。从立法和司法实践层面来看,少年法庭受案范围的拓展已成为一种客观事实。但在理论上如何看待这一事实,却是一个颇具争议性的问题,存在否定论、肯定论以及折中论三种观点。少年法庭受案范围应予以拓展,其理论正当性在于:一是功能优势性,少年法庭在专业化队伍建设、程序构造以及审判模式上更具优势,适宜更多地审理未成年人案件;二是价值统领性,依循全面保护未成年人权益与预防性司法理念,受案范围可涵盖未成年人民事、行政案件;三是规范释义开放性,《未成年人保护法》第一百零一条“未成年人案件”以及《未成年人审判意见》第七、第八条出现“等”“其他”措辞,具有较强的可解释性与开放性,能在维系法律稳定性的前提下积极应对不断变化的社会环境及更好地保护未成年人权益的现实需要。拓展路径需遵循保护性、相关性及饱和度要求,重点涵盖未成年人财产权益纠纷、严重不良行为、公益诉讼及行政案件,其中有必要对未成年人行政案件进行类型化梳理,以此明确少年法庭可审理的行政案件类型。

关键词: 少年法庭, 受案范围, 未成年人权益, 严重不良行为, 《未成年人保护法》, 《未成年人审判意见》

Abstract: The case acceptance scope of juvenile courts serves as a foundational element of the juvenile adjudication system,determining the extent of judicial intervention in safeguarding minors' rights and interests and directly shaping the breadth and depth of such protection.Legislative developments and judicial practice demonstrate an evident expansion of this scope,though theoretical perspectives on this trend remain divided among negation,affirmation,and compromise viewpoints.Justification for expanding juvenile courts' case acceptance scope rests on three pillars:functional superiority,as these courts excel in professional capacity,procedural design,and trial models;value leadership,guided by comprehensive protection and preventive justice principles that support inclusion of civil and administrative cases;and interpretative openness in legal norms,where terms such as "cases involving minors" in Article 101 of the Law on the Protection of Minors and open-ended wording in Articles 7 and 8 of the Opinions on Juvenile Adjudication allow adaptive responses to evolving social needs while maintaining legal stability.The expansion pathway should adhere to protective,relevant,and saturation principles,prioritizing minors' property disputes,serious misbehaviors,public interest litigation,and categorized administrative cases to clarify juvenile courts' jurisdictional boundaries.

Key words: juvenile courts, case acceptance scope, rights and interests of minors, serious misbehaviors, Law on the Protection of Minors, Opinions on Juvenile Adjudication

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ