吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 166-176.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2025.03.017

• 新时代 新青年 新学术:博士生论坛 • 上一篇    

环境能动司法的逻辑证成、实践表征与规范进路

张小康   

  1. (山西大学 法学院,山西 太原 030006)
  • 出版日期:2025-05-01 发布日期:2025-06-09
  • 作者简介:张小康,男,山西大学法学院博士生。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目 (20BFX159);国家社会科学基金重大项目 (21ZDA091)

The Logical Justification,Practice Representation and Normative Approach of Environmental Proactive Judiciary

ZHANG Xiaokang   

  1. (School of Law,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)
  • Online:2025-05-01 Published:2025-06-09

摘要:“党政逻辑”是环境能动司法建构的本质,其中党的环境治理意志塑造环境能动司法理念,特殊政法体制促成环境能动司法模式。“法治逻辑”是环境能动司法运作的核心,环境司法实现对环境立法规范缺失的补位和对环境行政规制缺陷的弥合,均彰显其介入环境治理的法治正当性。环境能动司法在积极参与环境治理中呈现从报应性司法到恢复性司法、从补救性司法到预防性司法、从自治性司法到回应性司法的功能递进,也面临从司法适法到司法造法、从恪守谦抑到积极作为功能异化的隐忧。应基于诉讼环境司法事务与非诉环境司法事务的区分,对其能动形态进行调试。在诉讼环境司法事务中,遵循审判场域中实体谦抑基础上的程序能动形态与非审判场域中有限的司法能动形态的界分;在立法性、行政性非诉环境司法事务中,应基于功能主义对环境能动司法的模式进行匡正。前者应通过环境法法典化的制度构造,形成协调统一的司法规则体系,并通过司法评议、典型案例指导等能动形式开辟环境立法与环境司法间的反馈回路;后者的职能定位应由直接介入环境治理,转向监督和促成行政机关履职,并将环境行政公益诉讼作为环境司法的主要发展方向,从而实现环境司法的最大效能。

关键词: 环境司法, 能动司法, 环境利益, 环境公益诉讼, 环境立法, 环境保护

Abstract: The "Party and government logic" is the essence of the construction of environmental proactive judiciary,in which the Party's will for environmental governance shapes the concept of environmental proactive judiciary,and the special political and legal system promotes the model of environmental proactive judiciary.The "rule of law logic" is the core of the operation of environmental proactive judiciary.The environmental judiciary's supplementation of the deficiencies in environmental legislative norms and the remediation of the shortcomings in environmental administrative regulation both highlight its legal legitimacy in intervening in environmental governance.In actively participating in environmental governance,environmental proactive judiciary exhibits a functional progression from retributive justice to restorative justice,from remedial justice to preventive justice,and from autonomous justice to responsive justice.It also faces potential concerns of functional distortion,from judicial application of law to judicial law-making,and from adherence to restraint to proactive action.In the future,the proactive forms of environmental judiciary should be adjusted based on the distinction between litigious and non-litigious environmental judicial affairs.In litigious environmental judicial affairs,the distinction between the procedural proactive form based on substantive restraint in the adjudication field and the limited judicial proactive form in the non-adjudication field should be followed.In legislative and administrative non-litigious environmental judicial affairs,the model of environmental proactive judiciary should be corrected based on functionalism.The former should establish a coordinated and unified judicial rule system through the institutional construction of environmental law codification,and create a feedback loop between environmental legislation and environmental judiciary through proactive forms such as judicial review and exemplary case guidance.The latter's functional orientation should shift from direct intervention in environmental governance to supervision and facilitation of administrative agencies' duties,with environmental administrative public interest litigation as the main development direction of environmental judiciary,thereby achieving the maximum efficacy of environmental judiciary.

Key words: environmental judiciary, proactive judiciary, environmental interests, environmental public interest litigation, environmental legislation, environmental protection

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ