资源依赖度、经济增长与碳排放的回弹效应

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.01.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：在“双碳”目标的背景下，分析资源依赖度、经济增长对工业碳排放回弹的作用机制，运用 Kaya-LMDI碳排放驱动因素分解模型测算我国2010—2019年31个省市区工业碳排放回弹效应值，并构建空间自回归模型（SAR）、空间误差模型（SEM）、空间杜宾模型（SDM）进行空间计量回归。结果表明：（1）2010—2019年我国能源资源消费碳排放回弹效应整体呈现出逐年递减的规律，且在时间和空间上具有溢出性影响，山西、宁夏、内蒙古等7个省区处于工业碳排放回弹效应高-高（H-H）聚集状态，北京、天津、上海等17个省市区处于工业碳排放回弹效应低-低（L-L）聚集状态。（2）资源依赖度对工业碳排放回弹效应的影响显著为正，具有一定空间外溢性影响。（3）区域经济增长会带来技术、资金、人力等要素的集中，驱动地区整体发展，并抑制工业碳排放回弹效应。（4）经济增长、资源依赖度对区域工业碳排放回弹的影响具有时空滞后效应和误差效应，地区间接影响的挤出效果会加大空间直接影响效果。

关键词： 碳排放, “双碳”目标, 资源依赖, 经济增长

Abstract: Under the background of"dual carbon" goal,this paper analyzes the mechanism of resource dependence and economic growth on the rebound of industrial carbon emissions,calculates the rebound effect value of industrial carbon emissions of 31 provinces and cities in China from 2010 to 2019 by using Kaya LMDI carbon emission driver decomposition model,and constructs spatial autoregressive model (SAR),spatial error model (SEM) and spatial Durbin model (SDM) for spatial econometric regression.The results indicate that:(1) the carbon rebound effect of energy resources consumption in China shows a law of decreasing year by year from 2010 to 2019,and has spillover effect in time and space.Seven provinces,including Shanxi,Ningxia and Inner Mongolia,are in the state of high-high (H-H) aggregation of industrial carbon emissions,while 17 provinces,including Beijing,Tianjin and Shanghai,are in the state of low-low (L-L) aggregation of industrial carbon emissions.(2) The effect of resource dependence on the rebound effect of industrial carbon emissions is significantly positive and has a certain spatial spillover effect.(3) Regional economic growth will bring the concentration of technology,capital,manpower and other factors,drive the overall development of the region,and restrain the rebound effect of industrial carbon emissions.(4) The effects of economic growth and resource dependence on the rebound of regional industrial carbon emissions have time-space lag effect and error effect,and the crowding-out effect of regional indirect influence will increase the space direct effect.

Key words: carbon emissions, "dual carbon" goal, resource dependence, economic growth

杨亦民, 王梓龙, 邓旭辉. 资源依赖度、经济增长与碳排放的回弹效应[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 45(1): 105-115.

YANG Yimin, WANG Zilong, DENG Xuhui. Resource Dependence,Economic Growth and the Rebound Effect of Carbon Emissions[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 45(1): 105-115.

参考文献

[1] EBENSTEIN A,FAN M,GREENSTONE M,et al.Evidence on the impact of sustainedexposure to air pollution on life expectancy from China's Huai River policy[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2013,110(32)：12936-12941.
[2] TATYANA,DERYUGINA,GARTH,et al.The Mortality and Medical Costs of Air Pollution:Evidence from Changes in Wind Direction[J].The American Economic Review,2019,109(12):4178-4219.
[3] LEANDRO S,CARVALHO,STEPHAN,et al.Poverty and Economic Decision-Making:Evidence from Changes in Financial Resources at Payday[J].The American Economic Review,2016,106(2):260-284.
[4] CHEN X,YANG L.Temperature and industrial output:Firm-level evidence from China[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,2017,95(5):257-274.
[5] MANKIW N G,ROMER D H,WEIL D N.A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1990,107(2):407-37.
[6] DE MEL S,MCKENZIE D,WOODRUFF C.Returns to capital in microenterprises:evidence from a field experiment[J].Policy Research Working Paper Series,2007,123(4):1329-1372.
[7] EASTERLY W R,LEVINE R,ROODMAN D M.Aid,Policies,and Growth[J].American Economic Review,2004,94(3):774-780.
[8] HECKMAN J J.Causal Parameters and Policy Analysis in Economics:A Twentieth Century Retrospective[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,2000(1):45-97.
[9] JEONG J,HONG T,JI C,et al.An integrated evaluation of productivity,cost and CO2 emission between prefabricated and conventional columns[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2016，142（4）：2393-2406.
[10] LIU B,SHUMWAY C R ,YODER J K.Lifecycle economic analysis of biofuels:Accounting for economic substitution in policy assessment[J].Energy Economics,2017,67(9):146-158.

[11] 杨莉莎,朱俊鹏,贾智杰.中国碳减排实现的影响因素和当前挑战——基于技术进步的视角[J].经济研究,2019(11):118-132.
[12] 齐绍洲,林屾,崔静波.环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?——基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J].经济研究,2018(12):129-143.
[13] 王林辉,袁礼.有偏型技术进步、产业结构变迁和中国要素收入分配格局[J].经济研究,2018(11):115-131.
[14] 邓宏图,徐宝亮,邹洋.中国工业化的经济逻辑:从重工业优先到比较优势战略[J].经济研究,2018(11):17-31.
[15] 李青原,肖泽华.异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J].经济研究,2020(9):192-208.
[16] 樊纲.“发展悖论”与发展经济学的“特征性问题”[J].管理世界,2020(4):34-39.
[17] 宋弘,孙雅洁,陈登科.政府空气污染治理效应评估——来自中国“低碳城市”建设的经验研究[J].管理世界,2019(6):95-108.
[18] 毛琦梁,王菲.制度环境、技术复杂度与空间溢出的产业间非均衡性[J].中国工业经济,2020(5):118-136.
[19] 胡志高,李光勤,曹建华.环境规制视角下的区域大气污染联合治理——分区方案设计、协同状态评价及影响因素分析[J].中国工业经济,2019(5):24-42.
[20] 董直庆,王辉.环境规制的“本地—邻地”绿色技术进步效应[J].中国工业经济,2019(1):100-118.
[21] 陈勇,柏喆.技能偏向型技术进步、劳动者集聚效应与地区工资差距扩大[J].中国工业经济,2018(9):79-97.
[22] 魏立佳,彭妍,刘潇.碳市场的稳定机制:一项实验经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):174-192.
[23] 席鹏辉.财政激励、环境偏好与垂直式环境管理——纳税大户议价能力的视角[J].中国工业经济,2017(11):100-117.
[24] 龙小宁,万威.环境规制、企业利润率与合规成本规模异质性[J].中国工业经济,2017(6):155-174.
[25] 余东华,孙婷.环境规制、技能溢价与制造业国际竞争力[J].中国工业经济,2017(5):35-53.
[26] 钱龙,洪名勇.非农就业、土地流转与农业生产效率变化——基于CFPS的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2016(12):2-16.

[27] 严成樑,李涛,兰伟.金融发展、创新与二氧化碳排放[J].金融研究,2016(1):14-30.

[28] 陈娟丽，郝艳.碳达峰目标下碳排放影响评价的政策与制度探索[J].中南林业科技大学学报（社会科学版），2022（6）：48-55.