自然保护区生态移民农户的生计响应测度——以小溪国家级自然保护区生态移民调查数据为样本

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.06.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：生计问题是自然保护区生态移民城镇化安置中的重要问题，认识和解决这一问题不能忽视移民的生计响应。基于“四维度三强度”生计响应分析框架和测度方法，以小溪国家级自然保护区261户移民农户调查数据为样本，测度了武陵山片区自然保护区移民农户的生计响应情况，发现移民生计资本响应不均衡且移民获取资本能力较弱。移民户生计方式响应最好但移民户之间差异较大，移民户生计产出响应较为明显，尤其是生计产出的行动响应方面最强，移民户生计空间响应相对较弱但移民户之间的差异相对较小。结果表明，武陵山片区自然保护区移民农户的生计响应情况总体较好，但移民农户的生计响应强度由感知、意愿到行动呈现依次递减状态，且移民农户的生计空间响应和物质资本响应仍有较大提升空间。此外，移民生计响应的维度和强度，对移民生计增收机制起着强化或抑制的作用，进而影响移民的持续发展。妥善应对生计响应外部环境带来的各种影响，尊重并激发生计主体的能动性选择，形成移民生计响应与增收机制的正向循环，是提升移民生计响应强度、形成移民持续生计能力、实现移民持续发展的基本思路和路径方法。

关键词： 生态移民, 城镇化安置, 生计响应, 测度, 小溪国家级自然保护区

Abstract: Livelihood is an important issue in the urbanization of ecological immigrants in nature reserves,and the livelihood response of immigrants should not be ignored to understand and solve this problem.Based on the "four-dimension and three-intensity" livelihood response analysis framework and measurement method,this paper measures the livelihood response of migrant farmers in nature reserves ofWuling Mountainous area,taking the survey data of 261 migrant farmers in Xiaoxi National Nature Reserve as the sample.It is found that the immigrant livelihood capital response is uneven and the immigrants' ability to obtain capital is weak,the immigrant households' livelihood style response is the best,but there are great differences among the immigrant households.The response of livelihood output of immigrant households is more obvious,especially the action response of livelihood output is the strongest,the spatial response of livelihood of immigrant households is relatively weak,but the difference between immigrant households is relatively small.The results show that the livelihood response of migrant farmers in nature reserves in Wuling Mountainous area is generally good,but the livelihood response intensity of migrant farmers decreases successively in their perception,willingness,and action,and the livelihood spatial response and material capital response of migrant farmers still have much room for improvement.In addition,the dimension and intensity of migrants' livelihood response strengthen or restrain the mechanism of increasing migrants' livelihood income,which in turn affects the sustainable development of immigrants.In order to enhance the response intensity,form the ability of sustainable livelihood,and realize the sustainable development of immigrants,we should properly respond to various impacts of the external environment,respect and stimulate the active choices of the main body of livelihood,and form a positive cycle of the immigrants' livelihood response and income increase mechanism.

Key words: ecological migration, urbanization resettlement, livelihood response, measurement, Xiaoxi National Nature Reserve

李晓冰. 自然保护区生态移民农户的生计响应测度——以小溪国家级自然保护区生态移民调查数据为样本[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2020, 41(6): 152-160.

LI Xiaobing. Measurement of Livelihood Response of Ecological Migrant Farmers in NatureReserves:Based on the Survey Data of Ecological Migration in Xiaoxi National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition), 2020, 41(6): 152-160.

参考文献

[1] 中华人民共和国生态环境部.2018中国生态环境状况公报[R/OL].[2020-02-12].http://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/201905/P020190619587632630618.pdf.
[2] 东梅，魏涛，师东晖，等.生态移民满意度驱动机制及其安置方式选择策略研究[M].北京：经济科学出版社,2015.
[3] 游俊，冷志明，丁建军.中国连片特困区发展报告(2014—2015)[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社,2015:28.
[4] 夏柱智，贺雪峰.半工半耕与中国渐进城镇化模式[J].中国社会科学.2017（12）:119.
[5] LEETE R.Population Environment and Poverty,Population and Development Strategies 2001[M].New York.Published by United Nation Population Fund,August 2001:18.
[6] MYERS N.Environmental Refugees: An Emergent Security Issue[J].13th Economic Forum,Prague,May 2005:23-27.
[7] BINNEMA T,NIEMI M.Let the Line be Drawn Now: Wilderness,Conservation,and the Exclusion of Aboriginal People from Banff National Park in Canada[J].Environmental History,2006，11（4）:724-750.
[8] DEAR C,MCCOOL S.Causes and Consequences of Displacement Decision-making in Banhine National Park,Mozambique[J].Conservation and Society,2010，8（2）:103-111.
[9] SOLTAU K S.Conservation-Related Resettlement in Central Africa:Environmental and Social Risks[J].Development and Change,2003，34（3）:525-551.
[10] 胡业翠，郑方钰，徐爽.广西生态移民迁入区的移民效应评估[J].农业工程学报，2017（17）：264-270.
[11] 胡业翠，武淑芳，王静.基于参与式调查的广西生态移民迁入区农户收入效应评价[J].农业工程学报，2016（21）：264-270.
[12] 张华忠，周维，李军朝.三峡库区农村移民安置模式对移民家庭收入的影响分析[J].长江流域资源与环境，2011(3):352-356.
[13] 王静，朱琳.基于可持续生计分析框架的农户宅基地流转意愿研究[J].中国农业资源与区划，2018（6）:165-170.
[14] 李小建.农户地理论[M].北京：科学出版社,2009:78-82.
[15] 游俊，冷志明，丁建军.中国连片特困区发展报告（2018—2019）[M].北京：社会科学文献出版社，2019.
[16] CHAMBERS R，CONWAY G.Sutainablel Rural Livelihoods:Practical Concepts for the 21st Century[J].IDS Dis-cussion Paper, Institute of Development Studies,Brighton,UK,1992:296.
[17] 游俊，李晓冰.生计响应视域下的产业扶贫益贫机制研究——以贵州省瓮安县为例[J].西南民族大学学报（人文社会科学版），2019（10）.
[18] 李小云，蕫强，饶小龙，等.农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用[J].中国农村经济，2007(4):33.
[19] 丁建军，金宁波，贾武，等.武陵山片区城镇化的农户生计响应及影响因素研究——基于3个典型乡镇355户农户调查数据的分析[J].地理研究，2019（8）:2027-2043.
[20] 吴雄周.产业扶贫农户生计协同响应机制的解构及实践[J].甘肃社会科学，2019（4）:176-183.
[21] 袁明达，夏文星.产业扶贫中农户生计响应特征、影响因素及对策——以湖南省安化县兴果村为例[J].农业科学研究，2019（9）:66-75.
[22] 金惠双，吴雄周.产业扶贫农户生计响应研究——以贵州省谷兵村为例[J].农村经济与科技，2020（1）:170-172.
[23] 张晓丹，刘芳.生计资本对农户参与扶贫产业响应状态的影响——以宁夏贺堡村为例[J].农村经济与科技，2019（9）:67-70.
[24] 张纬，张芷彗，熊嘉芝.民族地区农户产业扶贫生计响应及其优化分析——基于湘西州三个贫困村的实地调查[J].农村经济与科技，2020（1）:20-26.
[25] 金宁波.基于农户生计响应的城镇化减贫成效分异研究[J].农村经济与科技，2019（15）:138-139.
[26] 张小明.西部地区生态移民研究[D].杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2008:117.