吉首大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

 “网络诽谤解释”之刑法解释论剖析

庄乾龙,朱志炜   

  1. (1.北京林业大学 法学系,北京 100083;2.中国人民大学 法学院,北京 100872)
  • 出版日期:2016-05-01 发布日期:2016-06-27
  • 作者简介:庄乾龙,男,博士,北京林业大学法学系讲师。
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(15YJC820088)

On the Interpretation of Criminal Law on “The Judicial Interpretation on Internet Defamation”

ZHUANG Qianlong,ZHU Zhiwei   

  1. (1.Law Department,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China;2.Law School,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
  • Online:2016-05-01 Published:2016-06-27

摘要:

“网络诽谤解释”以实质解释论为立场,扩张了诽谤、寻衅滋事等罪的成立范围。特别是“网络诽谤解释”借助“累积犯”理论解释诽谤罪的“严重情节”,本质上创制了一种新型的刑事责任承担方式。而网络诽谤公诉情形的增加为公权力介入言论自由打开了缺口。形式解释论以法律条文为中心,禁止司法机关的入罪解释,但不排斥有利于被告人的解释。坚持形式解释论可防止传统犯罪网络入罪的异化,平衡名誉权与言论自由权保护之间的关系,彰显罪刑法定原则的人权保障精神。

关键词: 网络诽谤解释, 形式解释, 实质解释

Abstract:

“The Judicial Interpretation on Internet Defamation” stands for substantive interpretation,which expands the establishment scope of libel and Crime of Picking Quarrels & Provoking Troubles.Especially,“the Judicial Interpretation on Internet Defamation” interprets the serious case of libel by the aid of the cumulative offense theory.It creates a new type of way to bear the criminal responsibility.The increase of prosecution on libel intervene the gap of the public power intervention in the freedom of speech.Formal interpretation on the core of the legal provisions,prohibits the incriminating explanation,while not excluding the explanations for the benefit of the defendants.Adhering to the formal explanations can avoid the alienation of the incrimination of traditional criminal networks.At the same time,it can balance the relationship of reputation rights and freedom of speech,and highlights the spirits of the guaranteeing of human rights.

Key words: the judicial interpretation on internet defamation, formal interpretation, substantive interpretation

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ