吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 38-45.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2014.02.007

• 生态环保论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

贸易自由化与环境保护的博弈——环境非政府组织作为法庭之友的合理性探析

邹国勇,杨灵一   

  1. (武汉大学WTO学院,湖北 武汉 430072)
  • 出版日期:2014-03-15 发布日期:2014-04-21
  • 作者简介:邹国勇,男,博士,武汉大学WTO学院副教授。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金项目(11BFX148)

The Game between Trade Liberalization and Environmental Protection——An Analysis on the Rationality of Environmental NGOS as Amicus Curiae

 ZOU  Guo-Yong, YANG  Ling-Yi   

  1. (College of WTO Studies,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
  • Online:2014-03-15 Published:2014-04-21

摘要:WTO环境保护规则由于其用语模糊,各国环境标准不统一以及发展中国家在国际贸易中的劣势地位,在实践中并没有达到环境NGOS的期望。因此,环境NGOS转向以法庭之友身份参与WTO争端解决程序。经过“美国海龟海虾案”、“欧共体石棉案”和“巴西限制从欧盟进口翻新轮胎案”的实践,WTO争端解决机构逐步接受了环境NGOS提交的法庭之友陈述。为实现WTO可持续发展的宗旨、提高环境贸易争端司法程序的透明度、公正解决案件,让国际社会更加重视环保问题,WTO争端解决机构不仅应在实践中考虑法庭之友陈述,还应根据WTO实体规则和司法实践尽早制定出规范法庭之友陈述的规则。

关键词: 环境非政府组织, 法庭之友, 贸易自由化, 环境保护, WTO

Abstract: Because of the environmental protection rules in the WTO agreements,nonstandard environmental criteria in the world as well as the disadvantageous position of the developing countries in international trade,such rules,in fact,did not reach the expectations of Environmental Non-governmental Organizations(NGOS).Therefore,the NGOS turned to participate in the WTO dispute settlement procedure as amicus curiae.In the three famous judicial cases,namely “United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products”,“European Communities-measures affecting asbestos and products containing asbestos” and “ Brazil-Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres”,WTO dispute settlement body gradually accepted amicus curiae briefs submitted by Environmental NGOS.In order to achieve the purpose of WTO concerning sustainable development,to improve the judicial transparency in environmental trade disputes,to solve cases fairly and to make the international community pay more attention to environmental issues,WTO dispute settlement body should not only take amicus curiae briefs into consideration in its practice,but also formulate the rules on amicus curiae briefs in the light of substantive rules and judicial practice of WTO.

Key words: environmental NGOS, amicus curiae, trade liberalization, environmental protection, WTO

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ