吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 68-74.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4074.2013.06.012

• 法学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

我国刑事指令再审程序缺陷的法理探究——以新《刑事诉讼法》为视角

吴春雷,闫鹏飞   

  1. (天津商业大学 法学院,天津  300134)
  • 出版日期:2013-11-15 发布日期:2013-12-10
  • 作者简介:吴春雷,男,博士,天津商业大学法学院教授。

Jurisprudential Research on Procedure Defects of Criminal Direct Retrial——from the View of the New Criminal Procedural Law

 WU  Chun-Lei, YAN  Peng-Fei   

  1. (College of Law,Tianjin University of Commerce,Tianjin 300134,China)
  • Online:2013-11-15 Published:2013-12-10

摘要:刑事指令再审是刑事再审中经常被运用的程序,它对于纠正冤假错案发挥着积极作用。2012年我国新《刑事诉讼法》的修订,对指令再审程序予以了相应的修改与调整。尽管如此,从法理的角度考察,新《刑事诉讼法》并没有从根本解决理论上的实体公正和程序公正平衡、法的既判力维护、禁止双重危险原则侵害和司法中立原则的保护等困境和实践上的再审标准模糊、启动主体宽泛、审级制度复杂混乱和时效与次数不加限制等问题,因此,应进一步加强对刑事指令程序的研究,完善相关的法律法规。

关键词: 新刑诉法, 刑事指令再审, 程序缺陷

Abstract: The criminal direct retrial is often used in the criminal retrial system,but now it is loosely still in the legislation practice.Even in the academic circles,the criminal direct retrial is seldom involved or studied,because it is included in criminal justice supervision procedure.The legislation of criminal direct retrial has been revised and improved in the new criminal procedural law passed in 2012.However,from the perspective of jurisprudence,the birth defects of the criminal direct retrial has not been remedied,and there are still many dilemmas in both theory and practice.

Key words: new criminal procedural law, criminal direct retrial, procedure defects

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ