超越功利主义与自由至上主义——阿马蒂亚·森的目的权利观

吉首大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2006, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 11-16.

超越功利主义与自由至上主义——阿马蒂亚·森的目的权利观

（1.中国社会科学院哲学研究所，北京 100871；2.杭州师范学院政治经济学院，浙江杭州 310036；3.杭州电子科技大学人文学院，浙江杭州 310018）

出版日期:2006-03-15 发布日期:2012-06-25
作者简介:汤剑波（1972-），男，中国社会科学院哲学研究所博士后、杭州师范学院政治经济学院讲师。陈巍（1971-），男，浙江平湖人，杭州电子科技大学人文学院讲师。

Beyond Utilitarianism and Libertarianism——Amartya Sen’s Goal View of Right

(1.Philosophy Institute,Chinese Academy of Social Science,Beijing 100871,China;2.School of Political Science and Economics,Hangzhou Teachers’ College,Hangzhou Zhejian 310036,China;3.College of Humanities,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)

Online:2006-03-15 Published:2012-06-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：权利是一个重要的观念。功利主义的“工具权利观”把权利视为实现效用的手段，而自由至上主义坚持独立于后果的“约束权利观”。1998年诺贝尔经济学奖获得者阿马蒂亚·森试图建立一种具有较大包容性的目的权利观，它结合了权利内在价值的考虑与结果推理的运用。

关键词： 功利主义, 自由至上主义, 工具权利观, 约束权利观, 目的权利观

Abstract: Right can be taken to be an important concept.Utilitarianism insists on the instrumental view of right that considers right as valuable instruments to achieve utility.Robert Nozick insists on the constraint view of right that takes the form of seeing right as independence of consequence.Amartya Sen,the Noble Prize winner of economics in 1998,tries to go beyond the instrumental view of right and the constrain view of right and provides a goal view of right which can be combined not only with intrinsic value,but also with relativity and agent sensitivity of moral assessment.

Key words: utilitarianism, libertarianism, the instrumental view of right, the constraint view of right, the goal view of right

汤剑波, 陈巍. 超越功利主义与自由至上主义——阿马蒂亚·森的目的权利观[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2006, 27(2): 11-16.

TANG Jian-Bo, CHEN Wei. Beyond Utilitarianism and Libertarianism——Amartya Sen’s Goal View of Right[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, 2006, 27(2): 11-16.

参考文献

[1] [印度]阿马蒂亚·森.伦理学与经济学[M].王宇，王文玉译，北京：商务印书馆，2000.

[2] Amartya Sen:‘Property and Hunger’,G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992,p568.Amartya Sen:‘Rights and Agency’,Philosophy and Public Affairs,Vol.11,No.1,Winter 1982.

[3] [印度]阿马蒂亚·森.什么样的平等？[J].闲云译，世界哲学，2002，(2).

[4] Amartya Sen:'Property and Hunger',G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida :Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992,p568.Amartya Sen:‘Rights and Agency’,Philosophy and Public Affairs,Vol.11,No.1,Winter 1982,p5

[5] Amartya Sen:‘Rights and Agency’,Philosophy and Public Affairs,Vol.11,No.1,Winter 1982,p5

[6] [印度]阿马蒂亚·森.以自由看待发展[M].任赜，于真译，北京：中国人民大学出版社，2002.

[7] Amartya Sen :‘The Right to Take Personal Risks’,G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida :Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992.

[8] [印度]阿马蒂亚·森.公平[M].约翰.伊特韦尔，等.新帕尔格雷夫经济学大辞典：第二卷[C].北京：经济科学出版社，1992.

[9] Amartya Sen :‘The Right to Take Personal Risks’,G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida:Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992,p304.Amartya Sen:‘Property and Hunger’,G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992,p568.

[10] Amartya Sen:‘Freedom and Social Choice:the Arrow Lectures’,Rationality and Freedom,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,2002,p585.

[11] Amartya Sen:‘A Positive Concept of Negative Freedom’,in E.Morscher and R.Stanzinger (eds):Ethics:Foundations,Problems,and Applications,Proceedings of the 5th International Wittgenstein Symposium,Vienna:Holder-Pichler-Tempsky,198l,p48-49.

[12] Amartya Sen:‘Rights and Agency’,Philosophy and Public Affairs,Vol.11,No.1,Winter 1982,p5-6.

[13] Amartya Sen:‘Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason’,the Journal of Philosophy,Vol.97,No.9,September 2000,p484.

[14] Amartya Sen:‘Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason’,the Journal of Philosophy,Vol.97,No.9,September 2000,p483.

[15] Amartya Sen:‘Positional Objectivity’,Rationality and Freedom,Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,2002,p480.

[16] Amartya Sen:‘The Right to Take Personal Risks’,G.Lee.Bowie,Kathleen.Higgins and Meredith W.Michaels (eds):Thirteen Questions In Ethics,Folrida :Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers,1992,p309.

[17] Amartya Sen:‘Economics,Business Principles,and Moral Sentiments’,in Gerges Enderle (ed.):International Business Ethics：Challenges and Approaches,Notre Dame:University of Notre Dame Press,1999,p27－28.