吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 1-8.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2025.05.001

• 特稿 •    下一篇

中国式现代化的世界历史评判坐标

吴宏政   

  1. (吉林大学 马克思主义学院,吉林 长春 130012)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-11-03
  • 作者简介:吴宏政,男,博士,教育部“长江学者”特聘教授,吉林大学马克思主义学院教授,博士生导师。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AZD008)

The Benchmark of World History for Evaluating Chinese Modernization

WU Hongzheng   

  1. (School of Marxism,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
  • Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-03

摘要:对中国式现代化的深入研究,无法回避对其作出客观的价值评判问题。我们不仅要在中西 “比较”中基于事实判断论证它的独特本质,更需要基于价值判断对这一现代化道路作出“好不好”的本质评判。中国式现代化“好”,不仅仅是这一现代化道路对中华民族和中国来说的“好”,更是其对世界历史和人类命运来说的“好”。因此,应立足“大历史观”视野,从世界历史“时间坐标”和“空间坐标”出发,坚持“出于世界历史目的”而非仅仅“符合世界历史目的”的方法论原则,从人类整体利益出发,把“世界历史”作为中国式现代化的价值评判坐标,从而更加凸显中国式现代化道路内在的客观真理性。

关键词: 中国式现代化, 价值评判, 世界历史, 评判坐标, 客观真理性

Abstract: An in-depth study of Chinese modernization should involve making an objective value judgment on it.We should not only demonstrate its unique nature through factual comparison between China and the West,but also make a value judgment on whether this path of modernization is "good" or not.The "goodness" of Chinese modernization refers not only to its benefits for the Chinese nation and China,but also to its positive significance for world history and the destiny of humanity.Therefore,from the perspective of a "grand-historical view",and based on the "temporal coordinate" and "spatial coordinate" of world history,we should adhere to the methodological principle of "originating from the ends of world history" rather than merely "conforming to the ends of world history".Proceeding from the overall interests of humanity and taking "world history" as the benchmark for evaluating Chinese modernization will further highlight the inherent objective truth of the Chinese path to modernization.

Key words: Chinese modernization, value judgment, world history, benchmark for evaluation, objective truthfulness

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ