吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 131-135.
• 法学研究 • 上一篇 下一篇
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Online:
Published:
摘要:判决中的不同意见公开制度起源于英美法系国家,而为传统大陆法系国家所反对,这是由于两者在制度类型上的差异所致。在我国,公布不同意见有较大的现实意义:可以克服合议庭评议过程流于形式化,有助于强化法官责任制,增强法院审判活动的公开性和透明度,提高司法的权威和公信力。
关键词: 判决, 不同意见, 司法权威, 司法成本
Abstract: The institution,opening the obiter dictum,arises from AngloAmerican legal family countries,while,excluded by the continental countries.The large difference reflects their different institutional styles.In China,the publication of obiter dictum has bigger practical significances:it can avoid Full Court Review process being a mere formality and strengthen judge's responsibility and publicity of court's judicial activity,heighten judicial authority,etc.
Key words: judge, the obiter dictum, judicial authority, judicial cost
戴承欢, 蔡永彤. 判决中不同意见公开议题之再研究[J]. 吉首大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 31(2): 131-135.
DAI Cheng-Huan, CAI Yong-Tong. Research on Opening the Obiter Dictum in Judgment[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences), 2010, 31(2): 131-135.
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/CN/
https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/CN/Y2010/V31/I2/131