吉首大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 156-167.DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2025.05.016

• 新时代 新青年 新学术:博士生论坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

“枫桥经验”赋能诉讼调解:破解“合意贫困化”的机制嵌入与路径创新

牛媛媛   

  1. (北京师范大学 法学院,北京 100875)
  • 出版日期:2025-09-01 发布日期:2025-11-03
  • 作者简介:牛媛媛,女,北京师范大学法学院博士生。

"Fengqiao Experience" Empowering Litigation Mediation:Mechanism Embedding and Path Innovation to Resolve "Consensus Impoverishment"

NIU Yuanyuan   

  1. (Law School,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
  • Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-03

摘要:在司法实践中,诉讼调解“合意贫困化”困境突出,表现为迫于压力的“同意”、牺牲权益的“好意”及零和博弈的“恣意”,严重损害调解质量与司法公信力。其根源在于:制度层面,“调审合一”易致权力失衡与特定政策激励扭曲自愿原则;程序层面,规范缺失与有效“合意诱导”机制匮乏,导致实质沟通不足与过程随意性。新时代“枫桥经验”蕴含的多元协同、源头治理、情理法融合、依靠群众及数字赋能等合意促成机制为诉讼调解提供了宝贵的实践智慧与制度启示。为克服“合意贫困化”,提升诉讼调解实效,应将“枫桥经验”合意机制系统性嵌入诉讼调解全流程:构建覆盖院庭两级、贯穿全程的“递进式嵌入路径”,通过诉前强化协同治理与数字赋能、审前规范专业调解与保障自愿、庭审纯化裁判角色与探索调审分离、判后延伸和解与社会协同等关键举措,优化合意生成环境,并辅之以考评机制的深刻改革,弱化对调解率的过度依赖,强化质量导向。此路径旨在最终形成以高质量合意为核心,能有效化解矛盾、更好服务基层治理的诉讼调解新模式。

关键词: 诉讼调解, “合意贫困化”, 调审合一, “枫桥经验”, “枫桥式人民法庭”

Abstract: In judicial practice,the dilemma of "consensus impoverishment" in litigation mediation has become prominent,manifesting as coerced "consent",rights-sacrificing "goodwill",and zero-sum "arbitrariness",which severely undermine mediation quality and judicial credibility.The institutional roots lie in how the "integration of mediation and adjudication" fosters power imbalances and distorts the principle of voluntariness under specific policy incentives,while procedural deficiencies—including a lack of standardization and effective "consensus-inducing" mechanisms—lead to inadequate substantive communication and procedural randomness.The "Fengqiao Experience" (a governance model emphasizing social collaboration and conflict resolution at the community level) in the new era provides valuable practical wisdom and institutional insights for litigation mediation through its consensus-building mechanisms,such as multi-stakeholder collaboration,source governance,integration of reason,sentiment and law,public participation,and digital empowerment.To overcome "consensus impoverishment" and enhance the effectiveness of litigation mediation,the consensus mechanisms of the "Fengqiao Experience" should be systematically embedded throughout the entire mediation process.A "progressive embedding path" spanning both court and tribunal levels and covering all stages should be established,with key measures including strengthening collaborative governance and digital empowerment before litigation,standardizing professional mediation and safeguarding voluntariness in the pre-trial phase,clarifying the adjudicative role and exploring the separation of mediation and adjudication during trial,and extending reconciliation and social collaboration post-judgment.These steps will optimize the environment for consensus formation,supported by profound reforms in evaluation mechanisms that de-emphasize overreliance on mediation rates and reinforce quality orientation.This approach ultimately aims to establish a new litigation mediation model centered on high-quality consensus,capable of effectively resolving disputes and better serving grassroots governance.

Key words: litigation mediation, "consensus impoverishment", integration of mediation and adjudication, "Fengqiao Experience", "Fengqiao-style" People's Tribunal

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ