Content of Special Topic on Social Governance and Resilience Governance in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Ris BibTeX Toggle Thumbnails Select Soft Power of Resilient Cities:Connotation System,Realistic Situation and Enhancement Path TAN Shuang, ZHANG Xiaotong Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2023, 44 (4): 40-51.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.04.005 Abstract （371）      PDF（pc） （1687KB）（279）       Knowledge map    Save Integrating the hard power and soft power of risk prevention and resolution to enhance urban resilience is a strategic choice to achieve urban safety and sustainable development.The soft power of a resilient city can be divided into four major elements:psychological resilience,social resilience,management resilience and cultural resilience.In the critical life cycle,soft power also has different connotations with respect to the four different objectives of "perception and preparation" during the latency period,"response and rebound" during the outbreak period,"adaptation and coexistence" during the continuation period,and "change and enhancement" during the healing period.At the present stage,the soft power of resilient cities in China has shortcomings in all the four stages of the critical life cycle,so it is necessary to build a "triangle model" including concept,subject and mechanism.In order to effectively enhance soft power,we should adhere to the combination of the hard and soft,part and whole,cooperation and coexistence,and routine training and urgent response,bringing together the efforts of the government,NGO,enterprises and citizens,adapting two-dimensional cooperation,embedded education,guided communication,balanced evaluation and other strategies. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0） Select Community Resilience:Structural Tension and Adaptation in Community Risk Governance ZHAO Shiyu Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2023, 44 (4): 52-65.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2023.04.006 Abstract （570）      PDF（pc） （1391KB）（220）       Knowledge map    Save In the face of the disturbance and impact of modern social risks,improving community resi-lience is an important path choice for community risk governance reform,and it is also the meaning of promoting the modernization of grass-roots governance in the new era.Different from the understanding of resilience in the Western discourse system,which advocates reducing government intervention and unilaterally emphasizes the responsibility of community and individual governance,community resilience in China's governance environment is generated by the policy resource network centered on streets and neighborhood committees and the interaction of risk governance among various stake-holders,that is,the risk resistance of community governance structure is the key to the formation of community resilience.At the current stage,Chinese communities are highly dependent on means of risk governance such as vertical administrative resource absorption,emergency backstop of neighborhood committees,and strong political mobilization,and the community governance structure has long presented internal tensions such as "resource allocation internal","subject participation differential" and "governance system mutual exclusion",which frequently lead to the governance dilemma of risk sharing failure and lack of community resilience.In view of this,it is urgent to take measures such as promoting scientific redundancy,building a collaborative governance pattern,improving the linkage disposal mechanism,and consolidating the foundation of resilience culture as a response,so as to promote the structural adjustment and functional optimization of communities under risk situations.In this way,we can effectively resolve the inherent tension in the community governance structure and systematically improve the resilience level of communities. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0）