On Ecological Damage Liability and Its Legal Approach

doi:10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.03.007

Abstract

Abstract: The term "liability for environmental pollution and ecological damage" can be compatible with "tort liability for damage caused by environmental pollution and ecological destruction" and "liability for compensation for ecological damage".It lays the foundation of the basic civil law for the establishment and improvement of the environmental liability system in our country.The liability of ecological destruction has the nature of both public law and private law.Because of the particularity of the victimized object,the complexity of determining the responsibility,and the urgency and arduousness of undertaking the responsibility,it takes the liability of the nature of public law as the main content,and it is stipulated in the Civil Code with the help of the content of the "shell" of civil liability.It embodies the system innovation of Tort Liability in the Civil Code in the environmental era to accept the liability for ecological destruction.Its comprehensive legal approach also requires environmental law to establish preventive responsibility,regulatory responsibility and social responsibility for ecological destruction,so as to realize the connection and coordination between environmental law and civil law.

Key words: liability for ecological damage, tort liability for damage to others caused by ecological damage, liability for compensation for ecological damage

MEI Hong. On Ecological Damage Liability and Its Legal Approach[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2020.03.007.

References

[1] 阎红歌.世界进入环境时代[J].环境科学动态,1989(2)：1. [2] 吕忠梅.论环境侵权的二元性[N].人民法院报,2014-10-29（08）. [3] 竺效.论环境侵权原因行为的立法拓展[J].中国法学,2015(2)：261. [4] 徐淑琳,冷罗生.论环境损害民事责任的规范构造之缺陷——以《环境保护法》第64条为核心的评析[M]//赵秉志.京师法律评论：第十卷.北京：北京师范大学出版社,2016：92. [5] 徐祥民,邓一峰.环境侵权与环境侵害——兼论环境法的使命[J].法学论坛,2006(2)：14. [6] 吕忠梅.论环境法上的环境侵权——兼论《侵权责任法（草案）》的完善[M]//高鸿钧,王明远.清华法治论衡：第13辑.北京：清华大学出版社,2010：252-253. [7] 吕忠梅.环境侵权的遗传与变异——论环境侵害的制度演进[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2010(1)：131. [8] 克雷斯蒂安·冯·巴尔.大规模侵权责任法的改革[M].贺栩栩，译.北京：中国法制出版社,2010：83-88. [9] CHRISTIAN V B，ERIC C，eds.Principles,Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR)：Volume 4,Book VI[M].Munich:sellier.european law publishers，2009：3367. [10] 张宝.环境规制的法律构造[M].北京：北京大学出版社,2018. [11] 张翔vs.吴卫星：环境保护应该基本权利化还是国家目标即可[EB/OL].[2019-12-26].https://www.sohu.com/a/333918449_671251. [12] 蔡守秋.建设和谐社会、环境友好社会的法学理论——调整论[J].河北法学,2006(10)：34. [13] 孟德斯鸠.论法的精神：下卷[M].许明龙，译.北京：商务印书馆,2016：580. [14] 李钧.一步之遥：意大利环境“法规”与“法典”的距离[J].中国人大,2018(1)：51. [15] 李云霞.意大利环境保护法律体系概览[C]//第七届“比较民商法与判例研究两岸学术研讨会”论文集.上海：2019：117,120. [16] 竺效.论生态损害综合预防与救济的立法路径——以法国民法典侵权责任条款修改法案为借鉴[J].比较法研究,2016(3). [17] 邵建东.论德国《环境责任法》的损害赔偿制度[J].国外社会科学情况,1994(5)：40-43. [18] 竺效.生态损害的社会化填补法理研究[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,2007：104. [19] 德国民法典（修订本）[M].郑冲,贾红梅，译.北京：法律出版社,1999：246. [20] 刘骏.《法国民法典》中生态损害修复规则之研究[J].现代法治研究，2019(2)：55-56. [21] 李琳.法国生态损害之民法构造及其启示——以损害概念之扩张的进路[J].法治研究，2020（2）：87-103. [22] 罗伯特·V·珀西瓦尔.环境损害责任与全球环境法的兴起[J].杨朝霞,黄婧，译.吉首大学学报（社会科学版）,2016(3)：3，10. [23] 吕忠梅.为生态损害赔偿制度提供法治化方案[N].光明日报,2017-12-22（02）. [24] 李晨光.生态环境损害救济模式探析——游走在公法与私法之间[J].南京大学法律评论,2017(1)：59-72. [25] 孙佑海,王倩.民法典侵权责任编的绿色规制限度研究——“公私划分”视野下对生态环境损害责任纳入民法典的异见[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2019(5)：66,68,69. [26] JOHN B.Principles of European Law. Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another[J].Journal of European Tort Law,2011,2(1)：121. [27] 李昊.论生态损害的侵权责任构造——以损害拟制条款为进路[J].南京大学学报（哲学·人文科学·社会科学）,2019(1)：54.