Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences)
• Literature • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Li
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
As an important research method of literary theory,“interpretation” is the explanation to existing literary phenomena and theories.The essence of “cultural poetics” and “criticism to of literary theories” is the interpretation to the writers,works and literary phenomena.It is generally acknowledged in the field of literary theory that dialogical interpretation and moderate interpretation should be adapted,avoiding previous standpoints and modes to give forceful interpretation.Though containing theoretical perspectives and theoretical attitudes,the emphasis of interpretation is not on proposing new theoretical topics and constructing new theories.The crisis in the research of Chinese literary theories lies not in the forceful interpretation,but in interpretation itself.Too much attention to interpretation,rather than to new theoretical construction,is an important reason for the lack of individuality and innovation in the research of literary theories.
Key words: literary theories, crisis, interpretation, theoretical construction, innovation
CHEN Li. What Else Can Literary Theories Do Besides“Interpretation”?[J]. Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences), DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2016.02.016.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/EN/10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2016.02.016
https://skxb.jsu.edu.cn/EN/Y2016/V37/I2/116
[1] 张江.强制阐释论[J].文学评论,2014(6). [2] 陶东风.大学文艺学的学科反思[J].文学评论,2001(5). [3] 李春青.论文化诗学的基本特征与操作路径[J].江苏行政学院学报,2014(3). [4] 董希文.文学文本理论与理论的批评化[J].德州学院学报,2006(1). [5] 张伟.关于文艺学创新问题的理论反思[J].文学评论,2010(1). [6] 曹顺庆.多元的文学本质[J].文艺争鸣,2010(1). [7] 赵宪章.文艺学的学科性质——历史及其发展趋向[J].江海学刊,2002(2). [8] 李春青.我们还需要不需要文学理论?[J].人文杂志,2004(5). [9] 王一川.批评的理论化——当前学理批评的一种新趋势[J].文艺争鸣,2001(3). [10] 王一川.理论之后的中国文艺理论[J].学术月刊,2011(11). [11] 伊格尔顿.理论之后[M].商正,译.北京:商务印书馆,2009. [12] 赖大仁.新时期三十年文论研究[J].文学评论,2008(5). [13] 盖生.批评化不是中国文学理论的出路[J].扬州大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006(5).