儒家“仁爱”伦理与基督教“博爱”伦理思想比较研究

吉首大学学报（社会科学版） ›› 2002, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 53-58.

儒家“仁爱”伦理与基督教“博爱”伦理思想比较研究

（1.华东师范大学历史系，上海 200062；2.吉首大学外语系，湖南吉首 416000）

出版日期:2002-12-01 发布日期:2012-08-22
作者简介:朱全红（1963-），男，湖南桃源人，华东师范大学历史系博士生，主要研究美国史。张苹英（1959-），女，山东招远人，吉首大学外语系副教授，主要研究中西方文化。
基金资助:
湖南省教育厅资助课题“当代中西社会、文化价值观与可持续发展”（00C208）。

On the Confucian “Benevolence” and the Christian “Universal Love”

(1.History Department of Huadong Normal University,Shanghai 200062；2.Foreign Languages Department of Jishou University,Jishou,Hunan 416000,China)

Online:2002-12-01 Published:2012-08-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要：儒家伦理的“仁爱”思想和基督教伦理的“博爱”思想分别代表了东西方文明的思想精华，在人类文明发展的长河中发挥了巨大的历史作用。分析了两种思想产生的社会文化基础、现代意义，重点比较了两者的相同与差异之处。

关键词： 儒家伦理, 基督教伦理, 仁爱, 博爱

Abstract: The Confucian “benevolence” and the Christian “universal love” are the cores of Confucianism and the moral principles of Christianity, which have contributed a great deal respectively in the long history of the development of Eastern and Western civilizations. The difference of the two concepts is that the Confucius Benevolence means love for people according to their different social status with family, filial piety and fraternal duty as its basis, while the Christian universal love stresses an equal and unconditional love for others, even including one's enemies. These two ancient ideas are still of great significance today in modeling a new type of harmonious human relationship as well as in regulating the relationship between man and nature, man and society and his fellow beings.

Key words: confucian benevolence, christian universal love

朱全红, 张苹英. 儒家“仁爱”伦理与基督教“博爱”伦理思想比较研究[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2002, 23(4): 53-58.

ZHU Quan-Hong, ZHANG Ping-Ying. On the Confucian “Benevolence” and the Christian “Universal Love”[J]. Journal of Jishou University（Social Sciences）, 2002, 23(4): 53-58.

[1]	王海明. 社会公正理论辩难[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2006, 27(2): 17-32.
[2]	张怀承, 任俊华. 论中国佛教的生态伦理思想[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2003, 24(3): 44-49.
[3]	陈望衡. 儒家伦理与全球危机[J]. 吉首大学学报（社会科学版）, 2002, 23(2): 1-5.