Content of Philosophy in our journal

Published in last 1 year |  In last 2 years |  In last 3 years |  All Please wait a minute... For Selected: Download Citations EndNote Ris BibTeX Toggle Thumbnails Select Critiques to Hegel's Totality Thought:from Kierkegaard to Foucault CUI Shulan Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2024, 45 (5): 131-138.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.05.014 Abstract （171）      PDF（pc） （768KB）（96）       Knowledge map    Save Totality thought is an important part of Hegel's philosophy and it holds an important position in the history of Western philosophy.Hegel's totality thought has a far-reaching influence on later philosophers such as Marx,Lukacs,Korsch,Gramsci,etc.Hegel's totality thought covers many ideas under its huge system,such as thinking about living individuals,thinking about alienation,rupture,difference,contingency,gap,fragmentation,and so on.Kierkegaard and Nietzsche grasped the living and differentiated individuals and began to reflect on Hegel's totality thought.Foucault seized alienation,rupture,difference,contingency,gap,and fragmentation to criticize Hegel's totality thought.It can be said that the critiques to Hegel's totality thought from Kierkegaard to Foucault have enriched Hegel's thought from another dimension.It is a critical attitude that we should take seriously to absorb the huge ideological legacy left by Hegel.Seriously cleaning up the legacy of Hegel's philosophy and clarifying its evolution in later generations is what we must do to return to the true Hegel's philosophy. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0） Select The Significance of Mou Zongsan's Discussion on the Relationship between Morality and Wisdom in Pre-Qin Confucianism DENG Hui, LUO Yu Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2024, 45 (4): 66-74.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.04.007 Abstract （163）      PDF（pc） （742KB）（104）       Knowledge map    Save The concept of "creative transformation and innovative development" clearly points out that it is an important task of the times to realize the modern transformation of traditional Chinese culture.Mou Zongsan's reconstruction of Confucianism can be regarded as a modern interpretation of traditional Chinese culture,which can be used for reference.His concern about the relationship between Confucianism and science is to reinterpret the morality-wisdom relationship of pre-Qin Confucianism in order to excavate the scientific sprouts that may be contained in traditional Confucianism and respond to the so-called lack of science in Chinese culture.At the same time,Mou Zongsan also realized the disadvantages of modern science,and then put forward ways to deal with it.Therefore,he reinterpreted the relationship between morality and wisdom among Confucius,Mencius and Xunzi as Confucius' hidden concept of "the whole of morality and wisdom",the standing of Mencius' moral and spiritual subject,and the prominence of Xunzi's intellectual subject,and he tried to construct the relationship of "morality and wisdom".Although there are some limitations in examining the reinterpretation of the relationship between morality and wisdom of Mou Zongsan's pre-Qin Confucianism and science,it is of positive significance to realize the modern transfer of traditional culture. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0） Select Innate Personality and Personality Cultivation:Guo Xiang's Absorption and Transformation of the View of Sage of Mencius and Xunzi LUO Cai Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2024, 45 (4): 75-83.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.04.008 Abstract （119）      PDF（pc） （767KB）（96）       Knowledge map    Save Chinese culture has formed a tradition of pursuing sage as the ideal personality since ancient times.Based on the homogeneity of sages in innate personality,Mencius andXunzi emphasized that everyone can be "a righteous man or a sage" through "self-discipline and submitting to ritual" after birth,that is,"one can learn to be a sage".Guo Xiang absorbed the view of "innate personality" of Mencius and Xunzi;however,he emphasized the heterogeneity of innate personality between a sage and a mortal,and transformed their views into one that "a sages cannot be learned to be".On the one hand,Guo Xiang's view of sage emphasized the "distinction of a sage and a mortal" under the "heterogeneity of a sage and a mortal" in order to maintain the social order at that time,and on the other hand,he emphasized that a sage and a mortal can reveal their "distinction" through later "learning",so as to weaken the class distinction.This provided a theory for the reconstruction of social order and the settlement of an individual.Guo Xiang's view of sage inherited the moral ideal of "inner sage" taught by the Confucians in the pre-Qin period in the aspect of attaching importance to the cultivation of acquired personality.Guo Xiang had some similarities with Mencius and Xunzi in the aspects of recognition of subjectivity,weak attitude towards desire and emphasis on the understanding of inner spirit.However,in the specific path,he learned from the "full integration of mind and matter" of Taoism and the "equalizing things" and "free and unfettered" realm theory.On the whole,Guo Xiang learned from and developed Mencius and Xunzi's views of sage.The differences between them lie in that "a sage and a mortal are heterogeneous" and "a sage and a mortal are homogeneous",and also in that "one can learn to be a sage" and "a sages cannot be learned to be".Both emphasize the importance of acquired moral education or "practice" in the pursuit of moral life and the achievement of a harmonious and stable social order. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0） Select Where Should the Embodied Cognition Go?— Also on the Origin,Visions and Concerns of the Second-generation Cognitive Science CHEN Wei Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2024, 45 (1): 73-84.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.01.007 Abstract （370）      PDF（pc） （869KB）（306）       Knowledge map    Save The second-generation cognitive science,represented by embodied cognition,challenges the"physical symbol system hypothesis" and its derived computational representation.Its core view is to explain that all of our perceptual,cognitive,and motor abilities are constitutively dependent on aspects of the agent's body.Based on the above consensus,the 4E cognition has drawn a vision of the second-generation cognitive science by highlighting the role of the perceptual-motor system in the cognitive process,cognitive affordance,and the concept of embodiment based on perceptual experience.However,the spell of neuron reductionism,the reproducibility of empirical evidence,the lack of explanations and the dissolution of the predictive processing on the cognitive "sandwich model" all warn of the methodological pitfalls of the second-generation cognitive science.Due to the lack of explanation,the reliability and validity of embodied cognitive effect are often questioned.From the epistemological origin,the resolution of the cognitive "sandwich model" by predictive processing transcends the historical deadlock in the debate between the two generations of cognitive science on physical and mental issues.Many difficulties encountered by embodied cognition at present warn that there are still hidden worries in methodology in the second generation of cognitive science,and the future debate on the purpose,method,conceptual basis and motivation of embodied cognition will continue to provide new inspiration for the exchange,confrontation and blending of multi-disciplines within cognitive science. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0） Select Am I Responsible for Climate Change?—Interpretation of Individual Responsibility in Environmental Ethics QIN Xiaoyang Journal of Jishou University(Social Sciences Edition)    2024, 45 (1): 85-92.   DOI: 10.13438/j.cnki.jdxb.2024.01.008 Abstract （246）      PDF（pc） （699KB）（223）       Knowledge map    Save At present,the responsibility attribution in environmental ethics has become the focus of controversy,in which the argument on individual responsibility involves whether the individual can be regarded as a suitable subject of responsibility,whether individuals with high energy consumption should bear more moral responsibility and share more responsibility for emission reduction.The difficulty in proving individual responsibility is that the impact of individual behavior on climate change cannot be confirmed and traced because it is difficult to be intuitivelyvisible;therefore,"harmless" view and "ineffectiveness" view try to deny the necessity of individual responsibility from the perspective of causal effectiveness.In order to respond to this difficult question,the defense of individual responsibility should be approached from the retrospective and forward-looking perspectives of moral responsibility.The hazards of climate change are divided into two categories:the established harm and the expected harm.We can analyze the relationship between the established harm,expected harm and individual responsibility in the triggering case and the imperceptible case separately,grasping the inevitability,necessity and legitimacy of individual responsibility in environmental ethics from a holistic perspective and confirming that individuals have inescapable moral responsibility for environmental protection. Reference | Related Articles | Metrics | Comments（0）