吉首大学学报(社会科学版)

• 哲学研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

毛泽东与现代性:一个基于文献基础的理论考察

张明   

  1. (南京大学 哲学系,江苏 南京 210046)
  • 出版日期:2017-05-01 发布日期:2017-05-06
  • 作者简介:张明,男,博士,南京大学哲学系马克思主义社会理论研究中心助理研究员。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(10AZD001);中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助(2016M591830)

Mao Zedong and Modernity:ATheoretical Review Based on Literature

ZHANG Ming   

  1. (Department of Philosophy,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210046,China)
  • Online:2017-05-01 Published:2017-05-06

摘要:毛泽东的理论与实践中是否含有现代性因子,其究竟是否是一位现代主义者,构成了不断拷问现代中国政治思想史的重要命题。现有研究大致可界划为“四大解读模式”,即承认毛泽东现代主义者理论谱系学定位的“肯定契合型”解读模式、从对西方现代性价值反拨或超越维度上展开的“另类现代性”解读模式、新“左”派基于理论资源与象征情结意义上进行的“扩张式”解读模式,以及从后现代与后结构主义立场出发的“后式”解读模式。上述四大解读模式更多停留在一种概览性描述阶段,尚存在进一步深化的理论空间。毛泽东与现代性之间的关系并非是单向线性理论命题,而是蕴含多元张力关系于一体复杂命题,需要从马克思主义关于资本主义现代性批判的主调与近代中国现代性问题特殊的历史语境相结合的双位视角加以辩证理解。

关键词: 毛泽东, 现代性, 理论评析, 马克思主义, 历史语境

Abstract: Whether Mao Zedong’s theories and practice contain modernity factors and whether he is a modernist is an important issue in the history of modern Chinese politics and thought.Four modes of interpretation are found in present study.The first is the affirmative mode which admits that he is a modernist;the second is the special modernity mode which transcends western modernity value;the third the expanding modes which is based on the theoretic resources and symbolic sensation of the new left wing;and the fourth is the post interpretation mode which starts from post-modernity and post-structuralism.The four modes of interpretation are more of general descriptions,and need to be deepened theoretically.The relationship between Mao Zedong and modernity is not a proposition of one-way linear theory;rather it is a complex one,which should be interpreted from the dual perspectives combining Marxist criticism on capitalism modernity with the special historical context of the issues of modern Chinese modernity.

Key words: Mao Zedong, modernity, four modes of interpretation, theoretical analysis, Marxism, historical context

版权所有 © 2021《吉首大学学报(社会科学版)》编辑部
技术支持:北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司
公众号 电子书橱 超星期刊 手机浏览 在线QQ